<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic CWA Session Handled by Two PSN in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cwa-session-handled-by-two-psn/m-p/3560332#M520158</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Two node ISE cluster. One outside the FW.&amp;nbsp; The other inside the firewall. Customer would like to have initial WLC RADIUS request be sent to the internal ISE.&amp;nbsp; The internal ISE would then send a radius URL redirect for the Outside ISE to the client.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; The customer does not want to put any firewall holes or second interfaces on the Outside-ISE.&amp;nbsp; Would like that ISE to remain completely outside the firewall. Is this scenario&amp;nbsp; possible for Inside-ISE to start the session and hand off to Outside-ISE session ownership?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2017 14:39:35 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>scamarda</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-11-06T14:39:35Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>CWA Session Handled by Two PSN</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cwa-session-handled-by-two-psn/m-p/3560332#M520158</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Two node ISE cluster. One outside the FW.&amp;nbsp; The other inside the firewall. Customer would like to have initial WLC RADIUS request be sent to the internal ISE.&amp;nbsp; The internal ISE would then send a radius URL redirect for the Outside ISE to the client.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; The customer does not want to put any firewall holes or second interfaces on the Outside-ISE.&amp;nbsp; Would like that ISE to remain completely outside the firewall. Is this scenario&amp;nbsp; possible for Inside-ISE to start the session and hand off to Outside-ISE session ownership?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2017 14:39:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cwa-session-handled-by-two-psn/m-p/3560332#M520158</guid>
      <dc:creator>scamarda</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-06T14:39:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CWA Session Handled by Two PSN</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cwa-session-handled-by-two-psn/m-p/3560333#M520159</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;researching&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2017 15:52:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cwa-session-handled-by-two-psn/m-p/3560333#M520159</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jason Kunst</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-06T15:52:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CWA Session Handled by Two PSN</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cwa-session-handled-by-two-psn/m-p/3560334#M520160</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This will not work as there is no session hand-off from one PSN to another.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What about using WLC anchor and foreign, for example?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2017 15:58:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cwa-session-handled-by-two-psn/m-p/3560334#M520160</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jason Kunst</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-06T15:58:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

