<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Posturing without profiling in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/posturing-without-profiling/m-p/3509788#M520830</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Unless it's change, no you would use all 3 licenses.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Basically for posture check you use an Apex, Plus, and Base.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Basically if the feature uses a license type, it will also consume 1 of each lower license type.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2017 18:00:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Dustin Anderson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-10-12T18:00:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Posturing without profiling</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/posturing-without-profiling/m-p/3509787#M520828</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;My customer wants to make efficient utilization on ISE licenses, he doesn't corporate PC to be profiled, but instead use the Profiling License only for other end points like IP phone &amp;amp; wireless access points. Is this possible &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Nikhil&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2017 16:32:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/posturing-without-profiling/m-p/3509787#M520828</guid>
      <dc:creator>nikhilcherian</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-10-12T16:32:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Posturing without profiling</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/posturing-without-profiling/m-p/3509788#M520830</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Unless it's change, no you would use all 3 licenses.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Basically for posture check you use an Apex, Plus, and Base.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Basically if the feature uses a license type, it will also consume 1 of each lower license type.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2017 18:00:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/posturing-without-profiling/m-p/3509788#M520830</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dustin Anderson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-10-12T18:00:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Posturing without profiling</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/posturing-without-profiling/m-p/3509789#M520833</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2017 04:19:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/posturing-without-profiling/m-p/3509789#M520833</guid>
      <dc:creator>nikhilcherian</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-10-13T04:19:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Posturing without profiling</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/posturing-without-profiling/m-p/3509790#M520835</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 17px; font-family: '.SF UI Text'; color: #454545;"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 17px; font-family: '.SF UI Text'; color: #454545;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: '.SFUIText'; font-size: 17pt;"&gt;if you aren’t using profiling (endpoint group) for the authz policy then it should only consume base plus apex but there maybe issues with posture lease requiring plus&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 17px; font-family: '.SF UI Text'; color: #454545;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: '.SFUIText'; font-size: 17pt;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 17px; font-family: '.SF UI Text'; color: #454545;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: '.SFUIText'; font-size: 17pt;"&gt;this will require validation &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 17px; font-family: '.SF UI Text'; color: #454545;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: '.SFUIText'; font-size: 17pt;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 17px; font-family: '.SF UI Text'; color: #454545;"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 17px; font-family: '.SF UI Text'; color: #454545;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: '.SFUIText'; font-size: 17pt;"&gt;If any issues would recommend referencing this thread and reaching out to the ISE PMs , Kevin Gagnon and Matt Schmitz &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2017 16:18:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/posturing-without-profiling/m-p/3509790#M520835</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jason Kunst</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-10-13T16:18:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

