<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Different Interface for ISE Internet Traffic in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/different-interface-for-ise-internet-traffic/m-p/3521308#M528306</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Team,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can we use different interface of ISE for Internet traffic only? Customer wants to use seperate ISE interface for internet traffic only. All other traffic like radius, portal will go through default interface.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Neelesh Marathe&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2017 15:00:41 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>meetneelesh79</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-07-21T15:00:41Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Different Interface for ISE Internet Traffic</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/different-interface-for-ise-internet-traffic/m-p/3521308#M528306</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Team,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can we use different interface of ISE for Internet traffic only? Customer wants to use seperate ISE interface for internet traffic only. All other traffic like radius, portal will go through default interface.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Neelesh Marathe&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2017 15:00:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/different-interface-for-ise-internet-traffic/m-p/3521308#M528306</guid>
      <dc:creator>meetneelesh79</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-21T15:00:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Different Interface for ISE Internet Traffic</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/different-interface-for-ise-internet-traffic/m-p/3521309#M528307</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;That should be fine. The only restriction is that interface Gi0 for management. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2017 15:53:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/different-interface-for-ise-internet-traffic/m-p/3521309#M528307</guid>
      <dc:creator>hslai</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-21T15:53:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Different Interface for ISE Internet Traffic</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/different-interface-for-ise-internet-traffic/m-p/3521310#M528308</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Neelesh&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;By "internet traffic" do you mean ISE connecting to the internet for things like Smart Call Home, Profile updates, Client Provisioning Update Feed URL?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2017 00:19:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/different-interface-for-ise-internet-traffic/m-p/3521310#M528308</guid>
      <dc:creator>Arne Bier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-24T00:19:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Different Interface for ISE Internet Traffic</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/different-interface-for-ise-internet-traffic/m-p/3521311#M528309</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Arne,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes. Correct&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Neelesh Marathe&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2017 01:39:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/different-interface-for-ise-internet-traffic/m-p/3521311#M528309</guid>
      <dc:creator>meetneelesh79</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-24T01:39:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Different Interface for ISE Internet Traffic</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/different-interface-for-ise-internet-traffic/m-p/3521312#M528310</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just wondering whether your internet traffic is considered to be "management" or not.&amp;nbsp; The term 'management' in this context is probably overloaded - but it would be interesting to know &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;what&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt; management traffic has to use Gig0 (SSH, SNMP, NTP, intra-node ISE traffic, etc.) &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2017 02:49:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/different-interface-for-ise-internet-traffic/m-p/3521312#M528310</guid>
      <dc:creator>Arne Bier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-24T02:49:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Different Interface for ISE Internet Traffic</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/different-interface-for-ise-internet-traffic/m-p/3521313#M528311</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Inbound SSH to ISE admin CLI, inbound HTTPS to the ISE admin web portal, and inter-node replications/communications for the deployment, mainly.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2017 02:59:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/different-interface-for-ise-internet-traffic/m-p/3521313#M528311</guid>
      <dc:creator>hslai</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-24T02:59:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Different Interface for ISE Internet Traffic</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/different-interface-for-ise-internet-traffic/m-p/3521314#M528312</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Hsing,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it possible to route internet only traffic through different interface of ISE? I know we can use different interface for portals&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Neelesh Marathe&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2017 03:11:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/different-interface-for-ise-internet-traffic/m-p/3521314#M528312</guid>
      <dc:creator>meetneelesh79</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-24T03:11:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Different Interface for ISE Internet Traffic</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/different-interface-for-ise-internet-traffic/m-p/3521315#M528313</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have you not tried it?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You may set "ip default-gateway &amp;lt;gw-IP&amp;gt;" to the internet gateway that connected through another interface than Gi0. For management connections, either set specific routes or use "ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 &amp;lt;gw-IP-for-Gi0&amp;gt;"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2017 03:22:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/different-interface-for-ise-internet-traffic/m-p/3521315#M528313</guid>
      <dc:creator>hslai</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-24T03:22:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

