<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ISE Medium Deployment with &amp;gt;5 PSN? in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-medium-deployment-with-gt-5-psn/m-p/3576220#M528859</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;My customer currently has 2 PAN in HA active/standby, 5 PSN each at different sites, 2500 base, 500 plus, 100 apex. Active endpoints is less than 1200.&amp;nbsp; Customer wants to deploy 2 additional PSN at 2 different sites. Is there any technical (license, etc.) issue that would prevent having a total of 7 PSN without splitting out PAN into PAN + MNT?&amp;nbsp; Various docs say that if =&amp;gt; 5 PSN that makes it a "Large" deployment which warrants dedicated PAN and MNT nodes, which means they would need to buy 2 additional MNT nodes, for a total of 4. Customer does not want to do this. Please confirm. Note the Cisco Live preso slide. Thanks, Mike&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.ciscolive.com/online/connect/sessionDetail.ww?SESSION_ID=94152&amp;amp;backBtn=true" title="https://www.ciscolive.com/online/connect/sessionDetail.ww?SESSION_ID=94152&amp;amp;backBtn=true"&gt;Designing ISE for Scale &amp;amp; High Availability (2017 Berlin)&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG alt="capture_003_26062017_182438.jpg" class="image-1 jive-image" src="https://community.cisco.com/legacyfs/online/fusion/108726_capture_003_26062017_182438.jpg" style="height: 340px; width: 620px;" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2017 23:39:22 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mwenstro</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-06-26T23:39:22Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ISE Medium Deployment with &gt;5 PSN?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-medium-deployment-with-gt-5-psn/m-p/3576220#M528859</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;My customer currently has 2 PAN in HA active/standby, 5 PSN each at different sites, 2500 base, 500 plus, 100 apex. Active endpoints is less than 1200.&amp;nbsp; Customer wants to deploy 2 additional PSN at 2 different sites. Is there any technical (license, etc.) issue that would prevent having a total of 7 PSN without splitting out PAN into PAN + MNT?&amp;nbsp; Various docs say that if =&amp;gt; 5 PSN that makes it a "Large" deployment which warrants dedicated PAN and MNT nodes, which means they would need to buy 2 additional MNT nodes, for a total of 4. Customer does not want to do this. Please confirm. Note the Cisco Live preso slide. Thanks, Mike&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.ciscolive.com/online/connect/sessionDetail.ww?SESSION_ID=94152&amp;amp;backBtn=true" title="https://www.ciscolive.com/online/connect/sessionDetail.ww?SESSION_ID=94152&amp;amp;backBtn=true"&gt;Designing ISE for Scale &amp;amp; High Availability (2017 Berlin)&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG alt="capture_003_26062017_182438.jpg" class="image-1 jive-image" src="https://community.cisco.com/legacyfs/online/fusion/108726_capture_003_26062017_182438.jpg" style="height: 340px; width: 620px;" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2017 23:39:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-medium-deployment-with-gt-5-psn/m-p/3576220#M528859</guid>
      <dc:creator>mwenstro</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-26T23:39:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE Medium Deployment with &gt;5 PSN?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-medium-deployment-with-gt-5-psn/m-p/3576221#M528860</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's not a licensing issue, its technical support model&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We only support these models and the other models are not tested and therefore not supported&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2017 01:59:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-medium-deployment-with-gt-5-psn/m-p/3576221#M528860</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jason Kunst</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-27T01:59:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE Medium Deployment with &gt;5 PSN?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-medium-deployment-with-gt-5-psn/m-p/3576222#M528861</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for clarifying info. Customer would need to purchase 2 additional ISE nodes and deploy as separate PAN and MnT nodes, to get &amp;gt;5 PSN, making it a Large deployment model.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2017 18:00:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-medium-deployment-with-gt-5-psn/m-p/3576222#M528861</guid>
      <dc:creator>mwenstro</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-27T18:00:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE Medium Deployment with &gt;5 PSN?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-medium-deployment-with-gt-5-psn/m-p/3576223#M528862</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Correct&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2 PAN&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2 MNT&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt;5 PSNs&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2017 18:06:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-medium-deployment-with-gt-5-psn/m-p/3576223#M528862</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jason Kunst</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-27T18:06:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE Medium Deployment with &gt;5 PSN?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-medium-deployment-with-gt-5-psn/m-p/3576224#M528863</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also note there is no reason you can't mix VMs and physicals.&amp;nbsp; If the customer is running physical servers, they can just pick up two VM licenses (2500ish USD a piece) to expand their deployment.&amp;nbsp; Granted they need to have the VM resources to host the VMs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2017 22:13:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-medium-deployment-with-gt-5-psn/m-p/3576224#M528863</guid>
      <dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-27T22:13:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

