<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: New Profiling Policies? in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/new-profiling-policies/m-p/3547867#M530459</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Murata makes components for Samsung phones, I believe this is why their OUI appears on Samsung phones. Samsung does have it's own OUIs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When I search profiler conditions for Murata I don't get any results and I presume you'd find the same. There's nothing stopping you adding your own profiler condition and profiling policy for this mac address.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2017 15:24:26 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>M. Wisely</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-03-31T15:24:26Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>New Profiling Policies?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/new-profiling-policies/m-p/3547861#M530452</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Greetings,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does anyone know if there is any update feed for new device profiles? I have been running into a issue with new devices being detected as "Cisco-Device" and being denied. Was actually a Galaxy S7 with Nougat update.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is an update service for AV profiles, but nothing for the profiling system for devices?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since you can import profiles, I was hoping Cisco had a site or something to get updates. My profiling system only has the Galaxy S6, and the 8 comes out in a few weeks. It seems absurd to expect every admin to create a profile for new devices instead of one being made centrally and updated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2017 15:15:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/new-profiling-policies/m-p/3547861#M530452</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dustin Anderson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-30T15:15:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New Profiling Policies?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/new-profiling-policies/m-p/3547862#M530453</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;What version of ISE are you running? There is a feed service for the profiler in Administration -&amp;gt; Feed Service -&amp;gt; Profiler.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When you enable this it updates cisco provided profiles&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2017 15:44:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/new-profiling-policies/m-p/3547862#M530453</guid>
      <dc:creator>M. Wisely</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-30T15:44:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New Profiling Policies?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/new-profiling-policies/m-p/3547863#M530454</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It is turned on and seems to be running, but seems to be adding OUI's. I'm running 2.1 and a 2.2 test box.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Both do not have current phones over the last year. Does the feed service only update OUI's? or are some profiles just not added.?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2017 16:24:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/new-profiling-policies/m-p/3547863#M530454</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dustin Anderson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-30T16:24:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New Profiling Policies?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/new-profiling-policies/m-p/3547864#M530455</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Feed updates both OUIs and profiles.&amp;nbsp; You can check Change Audit log and filter on 'feed' to look for updates.&amp;nbsp; You may want to try disabling and re-enabling if not seeing any updates to profiles.&amp;nbsp; You can also log into ise.cisco.com and setup notification to get emails when updates occur.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Craig&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2017 23:06:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/new-profiling-policies/m-p/3547864#M530455</guid>
      <dc:creator>Craig Hyps</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-30T23:06:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New Profiling Policies?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/new-profiling-policies/m-p/3547865#M530456</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;What is the OUI value for the endpoint? Is it somehow got identified as Cisco...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It would be great if you may contribute by following &lt;A _jive_internal="true" href="https://community.cisco.com/docs/DOC-66340#jive_content_id_How_to_Contribute_Endpoint_Profiles"&gt;How to Contribute Endpoint Profiles&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2017 04:14:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/new-profiling-policies/m-p/3547865#M530456</guid>
      <dc:creator>hslai</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-31T04:14:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New Profiling Policies?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/new-profiling-policies/m-p/3547866#M530457</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #4a4b4c; font-family: 'Source Sans Pro', sans-serif; font-size: 16px;"&gt;60:F1:89 Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #4a4b4c; font-family: 'Source Sans Pro', sans-serif; font-size: 16px;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #4a4b4c; font-family: 'Source Sans Pro', sans-serif; font-size: 16px;"&gt;Not sure why a company as big as Samsung doesn't have their own OUI.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #4a4b4c; font-family: 'Source Sans Pro', sans-serif; font-size: 16px;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #4a4b4c; font-family: 'Source Sans Pro', sans-serif; font-size: 16px;"&gt;I'll look at uploading some profiles I've had to make. I think I have one for the new S8, but obviously can't test that yet.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2017 14:56:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/new-profiling-policies/m-p/3547866#M530457</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dustin Anderson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-31T14:56:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New Profiling Policies?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/new-profiling-policies/m-p/3547867#M530459</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Murata makes components for Samsung phones, I believe this is why their OUI appears on Samsung phones. Samsung does have it's own OUIs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When I search profiler conditions for Murata I don't get any results and I presume you'd find the same. There's nothing stopping you adding your own profiler condition and profiling policy for this mac address.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2017 15:24:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/new-profiling-policies/m-p/3547867#M530459</guid>
      <dc:creator>M. Wisely</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-31T15:24:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New Profiling Policies?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/new-profiling-policies/m-p/3547868#M530462</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Profiling hierarchy is based primarily on hardware based or OS based.&amp;nbsp; Each may lead to same conclusion, but the Hardware-based assume specific manufacturer like Cisco, Apple, HP, etc. but then will have sub-profiles to match on OS and other conditions.&amp;nbsp; Software driven (like Workstation) start with premise that any NIC may be in use by the endpoint and to rely initially on those OS indicators to classify endpoint. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can certainly create a new branch that starts with Murata, but since Murata is manufacturer for so many devices, it may not be usable from policy perspective to know a device is a "Murata-Device".&amp;nbsp; I would look under the Android branch and see if key conditions missing that would identify the Galaxy.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;/Craig&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2017 15:53:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/new-profiling-policies/m-p/3547868#M530462</guid>
      <dc:creator>Craig Hyps</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-31T15:53:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

