<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Question about Mobility License Upgrade in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/question-about-mobility-license-upgrade/m-p/3481080#M535893</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, it is possible to have licenses with different terms.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2017 10:20:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Craig Hyps</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-04-26T10:20:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Question about Mobility License Upgrade</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/question-about-mobility-license-upgrade/m-p/3481079#M535890</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman';"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 11.5pt;"&gt;I understand that normally you have to choose the term that matches the remaining for the existing wireless license installed. In the case of our customer, they have 3 years remaining, however, they’d like to have it only for 1 year. &lt;SPAN style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;Would it be possible?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman';"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 11.5pt;"&gt;The reason behind this is that the 1 YR license is more cost effective, and this is the only way they have in order to scale and protect their actual deployment/investment. They are getting more authentications, and they need to add more licenses.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman';"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 11.5pt;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman';"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 11.5pt;"&gt;Thanks in advance!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2017 09:36:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/question-about-mobility-license-upgrade/m-p/3481079#M535890</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marbeli Gonzalez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-26T09:36:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Question about Mobility License Upgrade</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/question-about-mobility-license-upgrade/m-p/3481080#M535893</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, it is possible to have licenses with different terms.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2017 10:20:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/question-about-mobility-license-upgrade/m-p/3481080#M535893</guid>
      <dc:creator>Craig Hyps</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-26T10:20:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Question about Mobility License Upgrade</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/question-about-mobility-license-upgrade/m-p/3481081#M535896</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes it's sure possible &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2017 10:45:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/question-about-mobility-license-upgrade/m-p/3481081#M535896</guid>
      <dc:creator>haydar.oracle.92</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-26T10:45:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

