<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: HA for TACACS+ in ISE with different hardware in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ha-for-tacacs-in-ise-with-different-hardware/m-p/3568089#M536021</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, but the overall scale will be based on the smaller h/w, 3495. For the performance sake, I recommend using 3595 as primary.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2017 09:10:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>howon</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-02-23T09:10:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>HA for TACACS+ in ISE with different hardware</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ha-for-tacacs-in-ise-with-different-hardware/m-p/3568088#M536019</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;My customer have existing Cisco ACS in SNS3495, they want to purchased HA for this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;With EoS notification from Cisco ACS, I plan to proposed Cisco ISE in 3595 for them.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The question are :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. Can we achieve HA, policy &amp;amp; configuration replication with existing hardware ??&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. If the existing appliance (ACS SNS3495) must migrate to Cisco ISE, can we achieve HA, policy &amp;amp; configuration replication with different hardware ( ISE with Tacacs in SNS3495 &amp;amp; ISE with Tacacs in SNS3595) ??&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2017 03:49:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ha-for-tacacs-in-ise-with-different-hardware/m-p/3568088#M536019</guid>
      <dc:creator>riferdiy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-02-23T03:49:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: HA for TACACS+ in ISE with different hardware</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ha-for-tacacs-in-ise-with-different-hardware/m-p/3568089#M536021</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, but the overall scale will be based on the smaller h/w, 3495. For the performance sake, I recommend using 3595 as primary.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2017 09:10:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ha-for-tacacs-in-ise-with-different-hardware/m-p/3568089#M536021</guid>
      <dc:creator>howon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-02-23T09:10:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: HA for TACACS+ in ISE with different hardware</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ha-for-tacacs-in-ise-with-different-hardware/m-p/3568090#M536023</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi howon,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What do u mean as "primary"?  Is it primary tacacs server configuration when we configure in switch ??&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How about ISE system configuration ?? Can we use admin,PSN, monitoring persona in both hardware ??&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2017 05:02:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ha-for-tacacs-in-ise-with-different-hardware/m-p/3568090#M536023</guid>
      <dc:creator>riferdiy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-02-24T05:02:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: HA for TACACS+ in ISE with different hardware</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ha-for-tacacs-in-ise-with-different-hardware/m-p/3568091#M536024</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I meant primary for Admin &amp;amp; MnT persona. So you would want the 3595 to be primary admin &amp;amp; MnT.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is no primary concept for PSN, but whatever you configure first on the switch as T+ server would be used more.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2017 15:46:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ha-for-tacacs-in-ise-with-different-hardware/m-p/3568091#M536024</guid>
      <dc:creator>howon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-02-24T15:46:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

