<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: 3 nodes ISE deployment in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/3-nodes-ise-deployment/m-p/3588761#M536026</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Asif, unfortunately, those are not supported configuration of the setup.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2017 14:37:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>howon</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-02-22T14:37:02Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>3 nodes ISE deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/3-nodes-ise-deployment/m-p/3588760#M536025</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I wanted to check whether mix and match of standalone and distributed deployment is still not supported. Does this apply if a third node is to be added to a current standalone pair for PxGrid only?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Appreciate any guidance on following two cases:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;First case:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3 x 3595 appliances (single deployment): 2 appliances for Admin/Monitoring/PSN while 3&lt;SUP&gt;rd&lt;/SUP&gt; appliance dedicated for PxGrid only (to be able to register more than 2 devices to PxGrid). &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is this a supported model?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;Second case:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3 x 3495 appliances (again a single deployment): 2 appliances for Admin/Monitoring/PSN while 3&lt;SUP&gt;rd&lt;/SUP&gt; appliance as PSN for Guest Services only.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It has been discussed as not supported multiple times but wanted to see if the following could be a workaround?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Appliance 1: Primary Admin + Primary Monitoring&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Appliance 2: Secondary Admin + PSN&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Appliance 3: PSN only&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Asif&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2017 14:22:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/3-nodes-ise-deployment/m-p/3588760#M536025</guid>
      <dc:creator>guest123</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-02-22T14:22:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 3 nodes ISE deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/3-nodes-ise-deployment/m-p/3588761#M536026</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Asif, unfortunately, those are not supported configuration of the setup.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2017 14:37:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/3-nodes-ise-deployment/m-p/3588761#M536026</guid>
      <dc:creator>howon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-02-22T14:37:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 3 nodes ISE deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/3-nodes-ise-deployment/m-p/3588762#M536027</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;OK. Thanks Hosuk!!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2017 14:43:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/3-nodes-ise-deployment/m-p/3588762#M536027</guid>
      <dc:creator>guest123</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-02-22T14:43:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

