<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ISE code recommendation in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-code-recommendation/m-p/3557838#M536180</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any 2.x will work&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2.1 with latest patch is fine&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sent from my iPhone&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2017 19:57:52 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jason Kunst</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-02-08T19:57:52Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ISE code recommendation</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-code-recommendation/m-p/3557837#M536179</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;"&gt;Greetings, &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;"&gt;My customer has been running 1.2 for years and wants to move forward. They like some of the 2.2 features ( &lt;SPAN style="color: #1f497d; text-indent: -24px;"&gt;Single-click guest account approval&lt;/SPAN&gt;, C&lt;SPAN style="color: #1f497d; text-indent: -24px;"&gt;ustom portal file upload&lt;/SPAN&gt;, &lt;SPAN style="color: #1f497d; text-indent: -24px;"&gt;Sponsor access to pending accounts) &lt;/SPAN&gt;but would rather have stability over features; any of the newer versions is going to be better than what they have.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;"&gt;What version should we suggest?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;"&gt;Thanks,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;"&gt; jb&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2017 19:50:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-code-recommendation/m-p/3557837#M536179</guid>
      <dc:creator>jonbrown</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-02-08T19:50:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE code recommendation</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-code-recommendation/m-p/3557838#M536180</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any 2.x will work&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2.1 with latest patch is fine&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sent from my iPhone&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2017 19:57:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-code-recommendation/m-p/3557838#M536180</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jason Kunst</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-02-08T19:57:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE code recommendation</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-code-recommendation/m-p/3557839#M536181</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Jason!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2017 20:30:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-code-recommendation/m-p/3557839#M536181</guid>
      <dc:creator>jonbrown</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-02-08T20:30:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

