<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Scaling in ISE Deployment in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/scaling-in-ise-deployment/m-p/3565406#M536517</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;That's correct.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Tim&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2017 20:51:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Timothy Abbott</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-01-12T20:51:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Scaling in ISE Deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/scaling-in-ise-deployment/m-p/3565403#M536510</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 11pt;"&gt;Hi all,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 11.0pt;"&gt;I need a clarification on the following deployment:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 11.0pt;"&gt;Assuming a customer has two ISE 3515 nodes running Administration &amp;amp; Monitoring (Active/Standby). The customer also has 2 PSN nodes (3515).&amp;nbsp; Does this mean that the scale of the total deployment is 7500 EPs or does it scale based on each PSN node (total size is 15,000).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 11.0pt;"&gt;The sizing guides&amp;nbsp; mention that the scale is dependent on the Admin and Monitoring nodes.&amp;nbsp; Therefore, in this case, I would assume the total deployment size is only 7500 – irrespective of how many PSNs are deployed.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="p1"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="s1"&gt;I would just like some clarifications please.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="p1"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="s1"&gt;Thank you&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2017 19:35:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/scaling-in-ise-deployment/m-p/3565403#M536510</guid>
      <dc:creator>srirsamp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-01-12T19:35:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Scaling in ISE Deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/scaling-in-ise-deployment/m-p/3565404#M536512</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is often a confusing design question we get.&amp;nbsp; Because the Admin / MnT personas run on a single 3515 appliance or VM equivalent, the maximum supported endpoints for the deployment is 7,500 even though they have two PSNs in the deployment as well.&amp;nbsp; You can add up to 5 PSNs in this deployment but regardless of how many, the deployment will not support more than 7.5K endpoints.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Tim&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2017 20:00:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/scaling-in-ise-deployment/m-p/3565404#M536512</guid>
      <dc:creator>Timothy Abbott</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-01-12T20:00:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Scaling in ISE Deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/scaling-in-ise-deployment/m-p/3565405#M536515</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Tim.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So irrespective of how the PSN nodes are housed (3515,3595, vm, etc.), the size of the deployment depends on the appliance/VM containing both the admin/MnT personas.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sri&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2017 20:04:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/scaling-in-ise-deployment/m-p/3565405#M536515</guid>
      <dc:creator>srirsamp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-01-12T20:04:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Scaling in ISE Deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/scaling-in-ise-deployment/m-p/3565406#M536517</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;That's correct.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Tim&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2017 20:51:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/scaling-in-ise-deployment/m-p/3565406#M536517</guid>
      <dc:creator>Timothy Abbott</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-01-12T20:51:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

