<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Does the latest version of ISE forward Radius Accounting information to remote destinations? in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/does-the-latest-version-of-ise-forward-radius-accounting/m-p/3485931#M536857</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does the latest version of ISE forward Radius Accounting information to remote destinations?&amp;nbsp; Or does it still just send out in syslog format?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;"&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Customer is attempting RSSO with Fortinet Firewall and ISE 1.4 is performing Radius functions.&amp;nbsp; Radius user attributes are not being passed to Fortinet.&amp;nbsp; So Fortinet is reporting usage info by ip address not user identity.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Would an upgrade allow this to happen?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2016 21:06:23 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>rohenson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-11-30T21:06:23Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Does the latest version of ISE forward Radius Accounting information to remote destinations?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/does-the-latest-version-of-ise-forward-radius-accounting/m-p/3485931#M536857</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does the latest version of ISE forward Radius Accounting information to remote destinations?&amp;nbsp; Or does it still just send out in syslog format?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;"&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Customer is attempting RSSO with Fortinet Firewall and ISE 1.4 is performing Radius functions.&amp;nbsp; Radius user attributes are not being passed to Fortinet.&amp;nbsp; So Fortinet is reporting usage info by ip address not user identity.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Would an upgrade allow this to happen?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2016 21:06:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/does-the-latest-version-of-ise-forward-radius-accounting/m-p/3485931#M536857</guid>
      <dc:creator>rohenson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-11-30T21:06:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Does the latest version of ISE forward Radius Accounting information to remote destinations?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/does-the-latest-version-of-ise-forward-radius-accounting/m-p/3485932#M536860</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;No, ISE does not currently support the forwarding of RADIUS Accounting if not acting as a RADIUS Proxy.&amp;nbsp; As noted, it is possible to set optional log targets for RADIUS Accounting logs, but these are not native RADIUS packets.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;/Craig&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 23:23:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/does-the-latest-version-of-ise-forward-radius-accounting/m-p/3485932#M536860</guid>
      <dc:creator>Craig Hyps</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-12-01T23:23:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Does the latest version of ISE forward Radius Accounting information to remote destinations?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/does-the-latest-version-of-ise-forward-radius-accounting/m-p/3485933#M536861</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Craig,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 13.3333px;"&gt;Sorry for resurrecting this from the dead. &lt;/SPAN&gt;I understand this is currently not supported in ISE but is there any roadmap for this feature? Some Firewalls like SonicWall still don't support syslog for the IP-Username mapping so they require Radius Acct. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Eric&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 21:29:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/does-the-latest-version-of-ise-forward-radius-accounting/m-p/3485933#M536861</guid>
      <dc:creator>Eric Pineda</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-31T21:29:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Does the latest version of ISE forward Radius Accounting information to remote destinations?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/does-the-latest-version-of-ise-forward-radius-accounting/m-p/3485934#M536863</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please reach out to our Product managers (internal email ise-pm@cisco.com&amp;lt;mailto:ise-pm@cisco.com&amp;gt;) to ask for a feature request&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 22:02:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/does-the-latest-version-of-ise-forward-radius-accounting/m-p/3485934#M536863</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jason Kunst</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-31T22:02:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

