<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ISE Posture Bad User Experience in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-posture-bad-user-experience/m-p/3474498#M537098</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;IMHO a minute or two is fine. Anything longer than that, users will complain.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many things can come into play, tho. Network connectivity (especially in wireless), types of posture conditions (Microsoft patch checks can take a long time, for example) and means of remediations.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2016 01:48:01 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>hslai</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-11-03T01:48:01Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ISE Posture Bad User Experience</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-posture-bad-user-experience/m-p/3474495#M537092</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have customer deploying Wireless Infra with Cisco ISE , everyday there are issues with anyconnect posturing example...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. The time taken is very uneven , sometime it is in 2mins to 45mins or may not connect also .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. Same user which was compliant in the morning , when move from one campus building to another it goes into non complaint state when want to be on network.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. Users are complaining&amp;nbsp; that they get disconnected or get pop up page to install Anyconnect even when it is installed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can someome help here...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2016 01:22:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-posture-bad-user-experience/m-p/3474495#M537092</guid>
      <dc:creator>Hemant Bharati</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-11-03T01:22:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE Posture Bad User Experience</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-posture-bad-user-experience/m-p/3474496#M537094</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the posting. If not done already, please engage Cisco TAC on this. Ask the customer to collect an AnyConnect DART whenever abnormal behavior arise.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2016 01:40:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-posture-bad-user-experience/m-p/3474496#M537094</guid>
      <dc:creator>hslai</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-11-03T01:40:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE Posture Bad User Experience</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-posture-bad-user-experience/m-p/3474497#M537096</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cisco TAC is involved , &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you please let me know what is the Ideal time taken for Posturing ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2016 01:44:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-posture-bad-user-experience/m-p/3474497#M537096</guid>
      <dc:creator>Hemant Bharati</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-11-03T01:44:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE Posture Bad User Experience</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-posture-bad-user-experience/m-p/3474498#M537098</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;IMHO a minute or two is fine. Anything longer than that, users will complain.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many things can come into play, tho. Network connectivity (especially in wireless), types of posture conditions (Microsoft patch checks can take a long time, for example) and means of remediations.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2016 01:48:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-posture-bad-user-experience/m-p/3474498#M537098</guid>
      <dc:creator>hslai</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-11-03T01:48:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE Posture Bad User Experience</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-posture-bad-user-experience/m-p/3474499#M537099</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Typical posture times are certainly much less than the ones reported&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would suggest leveraging posture features like Posture Lease + Passive Re-Assesment which would limit posture checks at every install time but would still check posture at a configured interval&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm not sure why are users getting un-install option, could be that Firewall is also configured to install AC and there are version inconsistencies &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Imran&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2016 17:17:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-posture-bad-user-experience/m-p/3474499#M537099</guid>
      <dc:creator>imbashir</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-11-04T17:17:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

