<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic windows supplicant with Posture in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/windows-supplicant-with-posture/m-p/3546345#M538589</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi team,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We’re trying to do a work around on an issue with AC NAM and the print spooler service on the client.&amp;nbsp; The issue is currently being worked on by TAC together with Microsoft. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So in the interim we are looking at using just the windows supplicant and use the AC NAC agent to do the posturing?&amp;nbsp; Is this even a supported deployment? Are there any caveats or issues?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks and regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 00:52:55 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Joe Montes</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-06-16T00:52:55Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>windows supplicant with Posture</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/windows-supplicant-with-posture/m-p/3546345#M538589</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi team,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We’re trying to do a work around on an issue with AC NAM and the print spooler service on the client.&amp;nbsp; The issue is currently being worked on by TAC together with Microsoft. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So in the interim we are looking at using just the windows supplicant and use the AC NAC agent to do the posturing?&amp;nbsp; Is this even a supported deployment? Are there any caveats or issues?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks and regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 00:52:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/windows-supplicant-with-posture/m-p/3546345#M538589</guid>
      <dc:creator>Joe Montes</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-16T00:52:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: windows supplicant with Posture</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/windows-supplicant-with-posture/m-p/3546346#M538590</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes anyconnect system scan (ISE posture) is supported to run without NAM&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 01:27:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/windows-supplicant-with-posture/m-p/3546346#M538590</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jason Kunst</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-16T01:27:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: windows supplicant with Posture</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/windows-supplicant-with-posture/m-p/3546347#M538591</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks matey.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;.:|:. .:|:.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Joe Montes&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Consulting Systems Engineer, Security – A/NZ&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2016 00:59:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/windows-supplicant-with-posture/m-p/3546347#M538591</guid>
      <dc:creator>Joe Montes</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-17T00:59:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

