<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ISE PSN sizing in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-psn-sizing/m-p/3483629#M538848</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dear folks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When we have 1 x PAN and 1 x MuT with 3415/3515 appliance,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How many PSNs we can deploy?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've looked through many documents, but I only can see the sizing with SNS3495/3595.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jina&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2016 04:08:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jinapark</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-05-19T04:08:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ISE PSN sizing</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-psn-sizing/m-p/3483629#M538848</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dear folks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When we have 1 x PAN and 1 x MuT with 3415/3515 appliance,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How many PSNs we can deploy?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've looked through many documents, but I only can see the sizing with SNS3495/3595.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jina&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2016 04:08:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-psn-sizing/m-p/3483629#M538848</guid>
      <dc:creator>jinapark</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-05-19T04:08:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE PSN sizing</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-psn-sizing/m-p/3483630#M538849</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Depends on the Deployment model, which is unclear.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If all personas are on one server, and you are running HA, then only the two PSNs can be deployed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If Admin and MnT personas are on a single server and the PSNs are on separate servers, then you can deploy 5 PSNs&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HOWEVER, with the two deployment models above you would be limited to 5000 concurrent endpoints.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you are deploying each persona on a separate server, then you need to use the 3495/3595 hardware as a baseline for your Admin and MnT Nodes and re-purpose your 3415/3515 appliances as PSNs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ANY deployment that will serve over 5000 concurrent endpoints should utilize the 3495/3595 ad the Admin and MnT nodes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Effectively, you &lt;EM&gt;SHOULD&lt;/EM&gt; be able to deploy 40 PSNs with the 3415/3515 as Admin and MnT, but they cannot handle the same numbers of AuthC/AuthZ as the 3495/3595 and is &lt;STRONG&gt;NOT&lt;/STRONG&gt; a deployment that would be recommended or supported.&amp;nbsp; This is the reason you cannot find the numbers for this.&amp;nbsp; It is a scenario that has not been tested.&amp;nbsp; With the first issue that arises, any call to TAC would result in requiring the upgrade of the Admin and MnT hardware.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here are some simple deployment guidelines:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG alt="deployment.PNG" class="image-1 jive-image" src="https://community.cisco.com/legacyfs/online/fusion/95624_deployment.PNG" style="height: 349px; width: 620px;" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Charles Moreton&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2016 12:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-psn-sizing/m-p/3483630#M538849</guid>
      <dc:creator>Charlie Moreton</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-05-19T12:58:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE PSN sizing</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-psn-sizing/m-p/3483631#M538850</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's all defined here and mentions those appliances&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/ise/2-0/installation_guide/b_ise_InstallationGuide20/Network_Deployments_in_Cisco_ISE.html&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2016 13:02:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-psn-sizing/m-p/3483631#M538850</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jason Kunst</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-05-19T13:02:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE PSN sizing</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-psn-sizing/m-p/3483632#M538851</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Charles, thank you so much for this explanation!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2016 13:34:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-psn-sizing/m-p/3483632#M538851</guid>
      <dc:creator>jinapark</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-05-19T13:34:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

