<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Design considerations for supporting multiple trusted CAs for EAP-TLS in ISE in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/design-considerations-for-supporting-multiple-trusted-cas-for/m-p/3715796#M542906</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, you can change the ISE cert with the simple import for authentication and it will be fine.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The only other consideration is will your endpoints trust the new cert chain?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If the endpoints do not have the new CA in their trusted store they may reject any authentication attempts from ISE signed by the new CA.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2018 19:09:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>thomas</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-09-30T19:09:38Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Design considerations for supporting multiple trusted CAs for EAP-TLS in ISE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/design-considerations-for-supporting-multiple-trusted-cas-for/m-p/3715102#M542891</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have a customer that is migrating from an existing external CA to a new external CA.&amp;nbsp; They're currently using their existing CA for EAP-TLS and they want to add the new CA to ISE, so essentially authenticate with both CAs during the migration.&amp;nbsp; Can they just add the cert chain for the new CA, generate and sign a CSR, import the new cert, and mark it to be used for authentication?&amp;nbsp; Is there anything else that needs to be done or any design considerations that they need to be aware of?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 08:50:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/design-considerations-for-supporting-multiple-trusted-cas-for/m-p/3715102#M542891</guid>
      <dc:creator>matthen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T08:50:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Design considerations for supporting multiple trusted CAs for EAP-TLS in ISE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/design-considerations-for-supporting-multiple-trusted-cas-for/m-p/3715122#M542898</link>
      <description>That’s pretty much it.  If you don’t care which CA issued the client’s certificate you shouldn’t have to do anything else.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2018 15:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/design-considerations-for-supporting-multiple-trusted-cas-for/m-p/3715122#M542898</guid>
      <dc:creator>gbekmezi-DD</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-09-28T15:44:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Design considerations for supporting multiple trusted CAs for EAP-TLS in ISE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/design-considerations-for-supporting-multiple-trusted-cas-for/m-p/3715796#M542906</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, you can change the ISE cert with the simple import for authentication and it will be fine.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The only other consideration is will your endpoints trust the new cert chain?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If the endpoints do not have the new CA in their trusted store they may reject any authentication attempts from ISE signed by the new CA.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2018 19:09:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/design-considerations-for-supporting-multiple-trusted-cas-for/m-p/3715796#M542906</guid>
      <dc:creator>thomas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-09-30T19:09:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

