<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic 2-Node ISE Deployment VM License in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/2-node-ise-deployment-vm-license/m-p/3678168#M543070</link>
    <description>&lt;DIV class="lia-message-subject lia-component-message-view-widget-subject"&gt;
&lt;DIV class="MessageSubject"&gt;
&lt;DIV class="MessageSubjectIcons "&gt;
&lt;DIV class="lia-message-subject"&gt;
&lt;H5&gt;Customer is&amp;nbsp;migrating&amp;nbsp;ACS functionality only. ISE requires Device Admin and Base licenses.&amp;nbsp;From a VM perspective using a&amp;nbsp;2-Node ISE Deployment, how many VM's are required?&lt;/H5&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Node1: PAN-Primary, MnTSecondary, PSN&lt;BR /&gt;Node2: PAN-Secondary, MnT-Primary, PSN&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 08:47:28 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>iagyte</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-11T08:47:28Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>2-Node ISE Deployment VM License</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/2-node-ise-deployment-vm-license/m-p/3678168#M543070</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="lia-message-subject lia-component-message-view-widget-subject"&gt;
&lt;DIV class="MessageSubject"&gt;
&lt;DIV class="MessageSubjectIcons "&gt;
&lt;DIV class="lia-message-subject"&gt;
&lt;H5&gt;Customer is&amp;nbsp;migrating&amp;nbsp;ACS functionality only. ISE requires Device Admin and Base licenses.&amp;nbsp;From a VM perspective using a&amp;nbsp;2-Node ISE Deployment, how many VM's are required?&lt;/H5&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Node1: PAN-Primary, MnTSecondary, PSN&lt;BR /&gt;Node2: PAN-Secondary, MnT-Primary, PSN&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 08:47:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/2-node-ise-deployment-vm-license/m-p/3678168#M543070</guid>
      <dc:creator>iagyte</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T08:47:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 2-Node ISE Deployment VM License</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/2-node-ise-deployment-vm-license/m-p/3678257#M543071</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;2 nodes = 2 VMs and that requires 2 VM licenses.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2018 12:57:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/2-node-ise-deployment-vm-license/m-p/3678257#M543071</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marvin Rhoads</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-07-31T12:57:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 2-Node ISE Deployment VM License</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/2-node-ise-deployment-vm-license/m-p/3678361#M543072</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;In&amp;nbsp;a 2-node deployment - for the PSN, does this work as ACT/ACT or ACT/PASSIVE?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2018 15:00:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/2-node-ise-deployment-vm-license/m-p/3678361#M543072</guid>
      <dc:creator>iagyte</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-07-31T15:00:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 2-Node ISE Deployment VM License</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/2-node-ise-deployment-vm-license/m-p/3678366#M543073</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Active/active.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Any active ISE node that has the the PSN persona enabled will actively service incoming endpoint requests.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2018 15:04:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/2-node-ise-deployment-vm-license/m-p/3678366#M543073</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marvin Rhoads</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-07-31T15:04:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 2-Node ISE Deployment VM License</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/2-node-ise-deployment-vm-license/m-p/3678441#M543074</link>
      <description>With ISE 2.4,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You will require 1 VM license per node, so in this case 2, they will be either R-ISE-VMS-K9= or R-ISE-VMM-K9 depending on if they require 3515 or 3595 capacity. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You will also require 1 TACACS node license for every VM you want processing TACACS requests.  So I would recommend 2 x L-ISE-TACACS-ND=.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;And then like in the past, you need 100 base licenses to enable TACACS. Here is a link to the ordering guide if you want the source.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/products/collateral/security/identity-services-engine/guide_c07-656177.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/products/collateral/security/identity-services-engine/guide_c07-656177.pdf&lt;/A&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2018 16:24:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/2-node-ise-deployment-vm-license/m-p/3678441#M543074</guid>
      <dc:creator>Damien Miller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-07-31T16:24:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

