<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: why do we have to integrate LDAP to ISE if AD is already intergrated in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/why-do-we-have-to-integrate-ldap-to-ise-if-ad-is-already/m-p/3301096#M546898</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;i see LDAP under "external identity group". is there a spefic reason we need LDAP integratioin with ISE even though AD integration with ISE is already in place?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2017 23:31:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>gavin han</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-12-22T23:31:56Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>why do we have to integrate LDAP to ISE if AD is already intergrated</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/why-do-we-have-to-integrate-ldap-to-ise-if-ad-is-already/m-p/3300896#M546896</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am new to ISE.&amp;nbsp;why do we have to integrate LDAP to ISE if AD is already intergrated? isn't AD integration to ISE good enough for authentication etc?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 18:42:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/why-do-we-have-to-integrate-ldap-to-ise-if-ad-is-already/m-p/3300896#M546896</guid>
      <dc:creator>gavin han</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T18:42:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: why do we have to integrate LDAP to ISE if AD is already intergrated</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/why-do-we-have-to-integrate-ldap-to-ise-if-ad-is-already/m-p/3300948#M546897</link>
      <description>Integration with AD is good enough to authenticate against AD, read AD&lt;BR /&gt;groups, etc. Not sure what do you mean by ldap integration here&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2017 16:27:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/why-do-we-have-to-integrate-ldap-to-ise-if-ad-is-already/m-p/3300948#M546897</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mohammed al Baqari</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-12-22T16:27:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: why do we have to integrate LDAP to ISE if AD is already intergrated</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/why-do-we-have-to-integrate-ldap-to-ise-if-ad-is-already/m-p/3301096#M546898</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;i see LDAP under "external identity group". is there a spefic reason we need LDAP integratioin with ISE even though AD integration with ISE is already in place?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2017 23:31:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/why-do-we-have-to-integrate-ldap-to-ise-if-ad-is-already/m-p/3301096#M546898</guid>
      <dc:creator>gavin han</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-12-22T23:31:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: why do we have to integrate LDAP to ISE if AD is already intergrated</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/why-do-we-have-to-integrate-ldap-to-ise-if-ad-is-already/m-p/3301101#M546899</link>
      <description>Because  there are other ldap providers other than ad such as open ldap. If&lt;BR /&gt;you use ad then u don't need it&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2017 00:24:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/why-do-we-have-to-integrate-ldap-to-ise-if-ad-is-already/m-p/3301101#M546899</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mohammed al Baqari</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-12-23T00:24:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

