<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: VG224 and 802.1x support in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/vg224-and-802-1x-support/m-p/3366049#M549275</link>
    <description>I agree with you. In my case this devices are at the user Access instead of&lt;BR /&gt;the data center. I will use MAB as I planned, but wanted to make sure before&lt;BR /&gt;discarding the possibility.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2018 18:50:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Antonio Macia</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-04-14T18:50:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>VG224 and 802.1x support</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/vg224-and-802-1x-support/m-p/3365960#M549271</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Anyone knows if the VG224 has a 802.1x supplicant? Can't find anything in the datasheet.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 18:53:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/vg224-and-802-1x-support/m-p/3365960#M549271</guid>
      <dc:creator>Antonio Macia</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T18:53:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VG224 and 802.1x support</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/vg224-and-802-1x-support/m-p/3365978#M549272</link>
      <description>I thought I replied to this. Answer no. Dot1x is switch feature&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2018 12:55:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/vg224-and-802-1x-support/m-p/3365978#M549272</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mohammed al Baqari</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-14T12:55:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VG224 and 802.1x support</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/vg224-and-802-1x-support/m-p/3365981#M549273</link>
      <description>In this case the VG224 is an endpoint like a phone, so I want to know if it&lt;BR /&gt;has a supplicant as the IP Phones have.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2018 12:59:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/vg224-and-802-1x-support/m-p/3365981#M549273</guid>
      <dc:creator>Antonio Macia</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-14T12:59:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VG224 and 802.1x support</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/vg224-and-802-1x-support/m-p/3366016#M549274</link>
      <description>I did some research and cannot find any information whether you can configure it as an 802.1x supplicant, so I'd say no. The other alternative is to use MAB to authorize the device to the network.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Why do you want to authenticate this device? Usually you would only authenticate end user devices (PCs, laptops, phones, printers etc) not network/voice infrastructure devices, which are usually in a secure DC.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2018 15:54:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/vg224-and-802-1x-support/m-p/3366016#M549274</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rob Ingram</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-14T15:54:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VG224 and 802.1x support</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/vg224-and-802-1x-support/m-p/3366049#M549275</link>
      <description>I agree with you. In my case this devices are at the user Access instead of&lt;BR /&gt;the data center. I will use MAB as I planned, but wanted to make sure before&lt;BR /&gt;discarding the possibility.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2018 18:50:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/vg224-and-802-1x-support/m-p/3366049#M549275</guid>
      <dc:creator>Antonio Macia</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-14T18:50:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

