<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Cisco ISE 2.3 Patch 1 in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise-2-3-patch-1/m-p/3351502#M549615</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;All,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Running ISE 2.3 (Patch 1 ) on 8 3395's, on my PAN the memory utilisation is indicating 62%, is this anything to be concerned about?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Looking through the forums its a common issue but fixed with an upgrade? I know patch 2 is available anyone able to help validate?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Total endpoint count 60,000&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;CPU running 2/3%&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Cheers,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 18:51:09 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jay233</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-02-21T18:51:09Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Cisco ISE 2.3 Patch 1</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise-2-3-patch-1/m-p/3351502#M549615</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;All,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Running ISE 2.3 (Patch 1 ) on 8 3395's, on my PAN the memory utilisation is indicating 62%, is this anything to be concerned about?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Looking through the forums its a common issue but fixed with an upgrade? I know patch 2 is available anyone able to help validate?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Total endpoint count 60,000&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;CPU running 2/3%&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Cheers,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 18:51:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise-2-3-patch-1/m-p/3351502#M549615</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jay233</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T18:51:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco ISE 2.3 Patch 1</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise-2-3-patch-1/m-p/3352758#M549620</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Jason,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The below is from link I pasted, it seems high CPU was resolved in 2.3 patch 1&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;TABLE border="1"&gt;
&lt;TBODY&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;
&lt;P class="pB1_Body1"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="cXref_Color"&gt;&lt;A class="URL" href="https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCvf75225" target="_blank"&gt;CSCvf75225&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;
&lt;P class="pB1_Body1"&gt;&lt;A name="pgfId-812148" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;/A&gt;PAN runs high CPU due to 100K limit in the Redis server.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;/TBODY&gt;
&lt;/TABLE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;TABLE border="1"&gt;
&lt;TBODY&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;
&lt;P class="pB1_Body1"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="cXref_Color"&gt;&lt;A class="URL" href="https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCvc86247" target="_blank"&gt;CSCvc86247&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;
&lt;P class="pB1_Body1"&gt;&lt;A name="pgfId-809124" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;/A&gt;High CPU usage caused by infinite loop threads on PSN.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class="pB1_Body1"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;/TBODY&gt;
&lt;/TABLE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/ise/2-3/release_notes/ise23_rn.html#pgfId-807037" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/ise/2-3/release_notes/ise23_rn.html#pgfId-807037&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have just upgraded to patch 2 and as far I remember, I didn't see any CPU related issue in patch 1. I think it won't harm to upgrade to patch 2 and monitor. You can always rollback.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Looking at your endpoint, it could be your hardware limitation. you also want to check whether your hardware requirement is met with your traffic before patch upgrade.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;hope this helps.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2018 22:28:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise-2-3-patch-1/m-p/3352758#M549620</guid>
      <dc:creator>paul46</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-03-21T22:28:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco ISE 2.3 Patch 1</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise-2-3-patch-1/m-p/3353038#M549623</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Paul,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the reply, as stated in the initial post. CPU usage&amp;nbsp;is not the&amp;nbsp;issue its more memory usage and why it seems to be creeping up&amp;nbsp;that's of concern, I was under the impression that the PAN and SAN would be utilised&amp;nbsp;in a similar manner. In my case the PAN is at 62% memory utilisation&amp;nbsp;and the SAN is 20% memory utilisation.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Do you think this my be a direct result of a memory leak problem?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Cheers,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Jay&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2018 12:16:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise-2-3-patch-1/m-p/3353038#M549623</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jay233</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-03-22T12:16:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco ISE 2.3 Patch 1</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise-2-3-patch-1/m-p/3353622#M549625</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;sorry, I was a bad reader &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Can I suggest you to update the title of thread to "Cisco ISE 2.3 High Memory Utilization"&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Just had a look at my ISE 2.3 (patch 2) RAM and it's 80%&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I found some articles where same issue was experienced on 2.2 which was resolved after upgrading to 2.3&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;But it looks like the issue is back to 2.3 again. please read below&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://supportforums.cisco.com/t5/aaa-identity-and-nac/ise-2-2-high-memory/td-p/3187875" target="_blank"&gt;https://supportforums.cisco.com/t5/aaa-identity-and-nac/ise-2-2-high-memory/td-p/3187875&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I would suggest to lodge a TAC case with cisco. I will take the same action.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Please keep posted&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 01:04:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise-2-3-patch-1/m-p/3353622#M549625</guid>
      <dc:creator>paul46</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-03-23T01:04:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

