<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ise maintenance in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-maintenance/m-p/3326431#M550350</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;BR /&gt;Is it more better to stop ise before the reboot &amp;amp; then start it again.&lt;BR /&gt;how can we ensure that there is minimal downtime doing the reboot. Is there &lt;BR /&gt;any particular order we should follow ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2018 06:35:35 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>suthomas1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-02-07T06:35:35Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ise maintenance</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-maintenance/m-p/3325936#M550348</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We have a distributed ise netork including 2 PAN with either of them acting as &lt;BR /&gt;primary/secondary monitoring node also &amp;amp; 2 Policy nodes. It has been running fine &lt;BR /&gt;for a while &amp;amp; we want to verify nodes again, as part of new program to be prepared &lt;BR /&gt;for unknown issues.this means, the nodes will be rebooted. All are vmwares.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;ISE-PAN-A &amp;gt; Primary for administration &amp;amp; secondary for monitoring&lt;BR /&gt;ISE-PAN-B &amp;gt; Primary for monitoring &amp;amp; secondary for administration&lt;BR /&gt;ISE-PSN-A &amp;amp; ISE-PSN-B &amp;gt; Policy nodes&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;can someone please help to determine what order they should be rebooted.As also&lt;BR /&gt;any other suggestions/checks that should be used to make this smooth.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 18:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-maintenance/m-p/3325936#M550348</guid>
      <dc:creator>suthomas1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T18:45:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ise maintenance</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-maintenance/m-p/3325946#M550349</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;- You should have no issues rebooting the 4 nodes separately and&amp;nbsp; in the order you mention. Well that is supposing that your NAD devices&amp;nbsp; use the PSN's symmetrically and in 'failover' mode ! (n&lt;EM&gt;o PSN is critical &lt;U&gt;on it's own&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;) (both are always used). Better also to not have policy-change work going on, on one of the admin nodes. Besides these low-profile issues, wait long enough between subsequent reboots and or issue via&lt;FONT color="#0000FF"&gt; ssh&lt;/FONT&gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;show application status ise&lt;/STRONG&gt; , to check wether a particular node is fully functional again.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;M.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2018 13:37:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-maintenance/m-p/3325946#M550349</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark Elsen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-06T13:37:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ise maintenance</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-maintenance/m-p/3326431#M550350</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;BR /&gt;Is it more better to stop ise before the reboot &amp;amp; then start it again.&lt;BR /&gt;how can we ensure that there is minimal downtime doing the reboot. Is there &lt;BR /&gt;any particular order we should follow ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2018 06:35:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-maintenance/m-p/3326431#M550350</guid>
      <dc:creator>suthomas1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-07T06:35:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

