<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic we have 3 deployement types in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-placement/m-p/2708634#M55039</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;we have 3 deployement types standalone, distributed,central types depending on your end point count,HA,locations etc you can choose one among these&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/ise/1-2/installation_guide/ise_ig/ise_deploy.html&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2015 10:00:40 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Venkatesh Attuluri</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-06-30T10:00:40Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ise placement</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-placement/m-p/2708632#M55035</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi ,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;what are&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;the best practices when deploying ise , As i know as of november tacacs will be inclused in ISE . We used to place NAC &amp;nbsp;at distribution layer and &amp;nbsp;acs at core level . since &amp;nbsp;ise included both tacacs and nac what is the place to deploy ISE&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 05:50:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-placement/m-p/2708632#M55035</guid>
      <dc:creator>susim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T05:50:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>This would depend on your</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-placement/m-p/2708633#M55038</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This would depend on your environment, HA requirements, SLAs, number of users, sites, latency between sites, etc. I would suggest you reach out to your local Cisco partner and go through a design session as there are a lot of moving parts to make ISE a successful implementation.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Thank you for rating helpful posts!&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2015 18:51:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-placement/m-p/2708633#M55038</guid>
      <dc:creator>nspasov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-06-24T18:51:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>we have 3 deployement types</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-placement/m-p/2708634#M55039</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;we have 3 deployement types standalone, distributed,central types depending on your end point count,HA,locations etc you can choose one among these&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/ise/1-2/installation_guide/ise_ig/ise_deploy.html&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2015 10:00:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-placement/m-p/2708634#M55039</guid>
      <dc:creator>Venkatesh Attuluri</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-06-30T10:00:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

