<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: SG300 and ISE - CoA in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/sg300-and-ise-coa/m-p/3303358#M550794</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;It's not a validated interoperable model according to the compatibility guide.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/ise/2-3/compatibility/ise_sdt.html" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/ise/2-3/compatibility/ise_sdt.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;However, it's believed to have some (unconfirmed) compatibility (if that makes sense). See this thread for details:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://communities.cisco.com/message/252935#252935" target="_blank"&gt;https://communities.cisco.com/message/252935#252935&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2017 13:22:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Marvin Rhoads</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-12-28T13:22:46Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SG300 and ISE - CoA</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/sg300-and-ise-coa/m-p/3303333#M550793</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Someone who knows if Cisco ISE 2.x and SG300 managed switches can operate together?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thinking about if CoA can be used.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 18:42:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/sg300-and-ise-coa/m-p/3303333#M550793</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jeppe Flensted</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T18:42:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SG300 and ISE - CoA</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/sg300-and-ise-coa/m-p/3303358#M550794</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It's not a validated interoperable model according to the compatibility guide.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/ise/2-3/compatibility/ise_sdt.html" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/ise/2-3/compatibility/ise_sdt.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;However, it's believed to have some (unconfirmed) compatibility (if that makes sense). See this thread for details:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://communities.cisco.com/message/252935#252935" target="_blank"&gt;https://communities.cisco.com/message/252935#252935&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2017 13:22:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/sg300-and-ise-coa/m-p/3303358#M550794</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marvin Rhoads</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-12-28T13:22:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

