<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ISE 2.3 &amp; RHEL Compatibility Question in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-3-rhel-compatibility-question/m-p/3438402#M551720</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;To start I just moved to the Public Community as it will get much better exposure&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Were not going to test every iteration. 7.0 is a baseline and unless they made drastic changes then support should be the same&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would recommend you validate it running fine in the lab&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I will go ahead and check with our testing teams as Likely they validated our newest release coming out soon with a newer 7.x&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2018 20:29:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jason Kunst</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-03-25T20:29:53Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ISE 2.3 &amp; RHEL Compatibility Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-3-rhel-compatibility-question/m-p/3438401#M551711</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Team,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have an ACS to ISE migration for both TACACS and RADIUS services.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The BOQ is built based on UCS C240-M4 with RHEL/KVM as hypervisior.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As per ISE 2.3 compatibility matrix, only RHEL 7.0 is supported, which means for me, that if we install 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, or even 7.4, we may face some compatibility issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The customer may ask if we can upgrade the RHEL in order to avoid any vulnerabilities and ensure that we have RHEL already patched.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any thought on this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Appreciate your feedback.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ahmad.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 18:51:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-3-rhel-compatibility-question/m-p/3438401#M551711</guid>
      <dc:creator>ahmurad</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T18:51:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE 2.3 &amp; RHEL Compatibility Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-3-rhel-compatibility-question/m-p/3438402#M551720</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;To start I just moved to the Public Community as it will get much better exposure&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Were not going to test every iteration. 7.0 is a baseline and unless they made drastic changes then support should be the same&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would recommend you validate it running fine in the lab&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I will go ahead and check with our testing teams as Likely they validated our newest release coming out soon with a newer 7.x&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2018 20:29:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-3-rhel-compatibility-question/m-p/3438402#M551720</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jason Kunst</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-03-25T20:29:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE 2.3 &amp; RHEL Compatibility Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-3-rhel-compatibility-question/m-p/3438403#M551738</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Jason,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I will test it on lab, meanwhile, please let me know in case you have any update from the testing teams.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2018 05:00:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-3-rhel-compatibility-question/m-p/3438403#M551738</guid>
      <dc:creator>ahmurad</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-03-26T05:00:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE 2.3 &amp; RHEL Compatibility Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-3-rhel-compatibility-question/m-p/3438404#M551758</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I reviewed the release notes and compatibility document for 2.4 and RHEL still the same.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/ise/2-4/compatibility/b_ise_sdt_24.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/ise/2-4/compatibility/b_ise_sdt_24.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any thought?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2018 14:22:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-3-rhel-compatibility-question/m-p/3438404#M551758</guid>
      <dc:creator>ahmurad</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-03-30T14:22:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE 2.3 &amp; RHEL Compatibility Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-3-rhel-compatibility-question/m-p/3438405#M551788</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I checked with our Product Manager &lt;A href="https://community.cisco.com//u1/23147"&gt;kegagnon&lt;/A&gt; and he said there is no change, if you require further requirements then please reach out thru sales channel.&amp;nbsp; My analysis from above still holds the same.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2018 18:17:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-3-rhel-compatibility-question/m-p/3438405#M551788</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jason Kunst</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-06T18:17:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

