<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Hi,If you just want ISE to in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ipep-inlien-posture-without-asa/m-p/2687866#M55433</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you just want ISE to authenticate&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the VPN users there is no need for the&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;IPEP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The IPEP should be able to provide posture possibilities for the StoneGate. I've experience with a third party WLAN controller. The IPEP is&amp;nbsp;vendor/device agnostic&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2015 21:07:52 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jwmolenaar</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-05-22T21:07:52Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>IPEP Inlien posture without ASA</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ipep-inlien-posture-without-asa/m-p/2687864#M55428</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It is neccesary configure IPEP if we dont want posture into vpn remote users?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I know that IPEP works with Cisco ASA for VPN posture assessment , so the question is what about VPN concentrator StoneGate ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Has anyone tested IPEP inline posture with Stonegate VPN concentrator or other different that Cisco ASA?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 05:44:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ipep-inlien-posture-without-asa/m-p/2687864#M55428</guid>
      <dc:creator>lamanso</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T05:44:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>If you don't want to posture</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ipep-inlien-posture-without-asa/m-p/2687865#M55431</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If you don't want to posture your clients to assign differentiated access-rights, then you don't need any IPEPs. In that case you just use the RADIUS-authentication and if you want the initial authorization to assign a group-policy, vpn-filter and so on.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2015 16:06:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ipep-inlien-posture-without-asa/m-p/2687865#M55431</guid>
      <dc:creator>Karsten Iwen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-05-22T16:06:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi,If you just want ISE to</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ipep-inlien-posture-without-asa/m-p/2687866#M55433</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you just want ISE to authenticate&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the VPN users there is no need for the&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;IPEP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The IPEP should be able to provide posture possibilities for the StoneGate. I've experience with a third party WLAN controller. The IPEP is&amp;nbsp;vendor/device agnostic&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2015 21:07:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ipep-inlien-posture-without-asa/m-p/2687866#M55433</guid>
      <dc:creator>jwmolenaar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-05-22T21:07:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

