<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ISE Plus License usage in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-plus-license-usage/m-p/3185943#M555585</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;When exactly does a Plus License get used?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have profiled Cisco Phones that Authenticate via MAB and then pass the following authorisation policy -&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;"If Device is in Endpoint&amp;nbsp;Identity Group / Profiled / Cisco IP Phones then allow access to voice domain"&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The phone authorises&amp;nbsp;fine but I do not see a Plus license being used.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would have thought because the auth policy is checking a group which contains profiled devices a plus license would be used upon access to the network.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 18:34:23 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>GRANT3779</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-02-21T18:34:23Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ISE Plus License usage</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-plus-license-usage/m-p/3185943#M555585</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;When exactly does a Plus License get used?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have profiled Cisco Phones that Authenticate via MAB and then pass the following authorisation policy -&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;"If Device is in Endpoint&amp;nbsp;Identity Group / Profiled / Cisco IP Phones then allow access to voice domain"&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The phone authorises&amp;nbsp;fine but I do not see a Plus license being used.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would have thought because the auth policy is checking a group which contains profiled devices a plus license would be used upon access to the network.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 18:34:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-plus-license-usage/m-p/3185943#M555585</guid>
      <dc:creator>GRANT3779</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T18:34:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE Plus License usage</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-plus-license-usage/m-p/3187010#M555586</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Good question - the exact mechanics of how licenses are consumed is not well explained by Cisco.&amp;nbsp; The closest answer I have read is exacly what you mentioned.&amp;nbsp; However - your AuthZ policy is not referring to a profiling attribute.&amp;nbsp; You are simply checking whether a device is in an Endpoint Group.&amp;nbsp; That comes for "free" with the base license, because Endpoint Identity Groups are used for multiple purposes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't have a concrete example, because I don't have PLUS (or EVAL) licenses, but if you were to start doing fancy AuthZ policies that involve conditions about the stuff you found as a result of profiling, then I would assume you'd consume a PLUS license.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2017 00:21:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-plus-license-usage/m-p/3187010#M555586</guid>
      <dc:creator>Arne Bier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-09-21T00:21:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE Plus License usage</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-plus-license-usage/m-p/3189820#M555587</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Arne,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes I guess that makes sense. I may test a few different auth profiles to see if I can find some consistency as to when a plus license is used.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2017 19:39:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-plus-license-usage/m-p/3189820#M555587</guid>
      <dc:creator>GRANT3779</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-09-26T19:39:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

