<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: MAB using MS SQL as a database in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/mab-using-ms-sql-as-a-database/m-p/4035764#M558338</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Have you reviewed &lt;A href="http://cs.co/ise-guides#ODBC" target="_blank"&gt;http://cs.co/ise-guides#ODBC&lt;/A&gt; &amp;gt; &lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/identity-services-engine-21/200544-Configure-ISE-2-1-with-MS-SQL-using-ODBC.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;Configure ISE 2.1 with MS SQL using ODBC - Cisco&lt;/A&gt; to see how it compares to what you're doing?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2020 22:42:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>thomas</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-02-25T22:42:17Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>MAB using MS SQL as a database</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/mab-using-ms-sql-as-a-database/m-p/4035711#M558330</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We are setting up a MS SQL server to store the MAC addresses for all the PCs in our network to be used for the purpose of remotely re-imaging the PCs when needed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have imported some test MACs into the SQL database in format username/password where both username and password are defined as the MAC address of the device.&amp;nbsp; Procedures are created and I have "imported" the groups (Group1 and Group2) that the MACs belong to into ISE.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The issue I am facing is that I am having trouble matching the MAC addresses in the database.&amp;nbsp; The authentication policy references the internal endpoints database, which is fine as this setup will be used primarily for PCs that have already been connected to the network earlier.&amp;nbsp; I have created a authorization policy under the existing MAB policy which matches on the SQL group that I imported earlier.&amp;nbsp; I see that ISE searches the policy I created but doesn't find a match and therefore continues and eventually hits the default authorization policy.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Has anyone setup a similar solution?&amp;nbsp; What match criteria should be used in the ISE? Or perhaps I should not have MAC address for both username and password in the SQL database, perhaps just the username?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any help would be greatly appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2020 21:00:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/mab-using-ms-sql-as-a-database/m-p/4035711#M558330</guid>
      <dc:creator>CiscoNutt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-25T21:00:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MAB using MS SQL as a database</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/mab-using-ms-sql-as-a-database/m-p/4035764#M558338</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Have you reviewed &lt;A href="http://cs.co/ise-guides#ODBC" target="_blank"&gt;http://cs.co/ise-guides#ODBC&lt;/A&gt; &amp;gt; &lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/identity-services-engine-21/200544-Configure-ISE-2-1-with-MS-SQL-using-ODBC.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;Configure ISE 2.1 with MS SQL using ODBC - Cisco&lt;/A&gt; to see how it compares to what you're doing?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2020 22:42:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/mab-using-ms-sql-as-a-database/m-p/4035764#M558338</guid>
      <dc:creator>thomas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-25T22:42:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MAB using MS SQL as a database</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/mab-using-ms-sql-as-a-database/m-p/4036461#M558399</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, that is acutally the guide I was following.&amp;nbsp; However, it specifies the SQL database use for login username and password. It does not really explain the use case for MAB, or what to match on for MAB.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2020 20:50:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/mab-using-ms-sql-as-a-database/m-p/4036461#M558399</guid>
      <dc:creator>CiscoNutt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-26T20:50:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MAB using MS SQL as a database</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/mab-using-ms-sql-as-a-database/m-p/4036501#M558403</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If using SQL as identity source for authentication: Use XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX format (Uppercase with ':' as delimiter) for username and xxxxxxxxxxxx (All lowercase without any delimiter) for password.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If using SQL as lookup source in the authorization policy: Use whatever format the RADIUS:Calling-Station-ID field is in. It should be XX-XX-XX-XX-XX-XX format on Cisco devices, but you can confirm by looking at the detailed log in live log. For lookup, the password should not matter.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If need to create DB to match in both cases, I suggest customizing the stored procedure call to massage the username format before searching it in the DB.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2020 22:53:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/mab-using-ms-sql-as-a-database/m-p/4036501#M558403</guid>
      <dc:creator>howon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-26T22:53:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MAB using MS SQL as a database</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/mab-using-ms-sql-as-a-database/m-p/4037124#M558434</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;So, what you are saying is configure the SQL DB in format&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;XX-XX-XX-XX-XX-XX?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;When I checked live logs I saw the RADIUS calling-station id as XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I will do some testing next week.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2020 20:40:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/mab-using-ms-sql-as-a-database/m-p/4037124#M558434</guid>
      <dc:creator>CiscoNutt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-27T20:40:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MAB using MS SQL as a database</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/mab-using-ms-sql-as-a-database/m-p/4039603#M558541</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It was the format of the MAC address entry in the SQL database.&amp;nbsp; Once I changed it to XX-XX-XX-XX-XX-XX we started to get hits.&amp;nbsp; Thank you very much for your help&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2020 19:55:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/mab-using-ms-sql-as-a-database/m-p/4039603#M558541</guid>
      <dc:creator>CiscoNutt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-03-03T19:55:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

