<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: VPN users authenticate with remote PSN in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/vpn-users-authenticate-with-remote-psn/m-p/4089660#M560561</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;When you say external RADIUS sequence what are you referring to?&amp;nbsp; The VPN device should point to ISE as RADIUS servers and you should have multiple RADIUS definitions for redundancy.&amp;nbsp; Do you have the HQ and remote PSN listed in the radius group on the VPN device?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If you have both defined in the RADIUS group and the HQ device failed at some point the VPN device might have failed over to the remote PSN.&amp;nbsp; Some network devices don't fail back to the first RADIUS servers in their list.&amp;nbsp; They will keep using the same RADIUS server as long as it is working.&amp;nbsp; Cisco WLCs by default don't fail back to the primary server in their list.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2020 22:49:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-05-20T22:49:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>VPN users authenticate with remote PSN</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/vpn-users-authenticate-with-remote-psn/m-p/4088069#M560486</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;When users VPN to the HQ with Anyconnect, they are authenticated to the remote office PSN.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I checked external radius for the sequence, it looks correct order check HQ first then the branch office.&amp;nbsp; But it went directly to the branch office when VPN in.&amp;nbsp; Office PC is able to login to the network with the HQ PSN.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2020 17:13:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/vpn-users-authenticate-with-remote-psn/m-p/4088069#M560486</guid>
      <dc:creator>ironman28</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-18T17:13:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VPN users authenticate with remote PSN</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/vpn-users-authenticate-with-remote-psn/m-p/4089660#M560561</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;When you say external RADIUS sequence what are you referring to?&amp;nbsp; The VPN device should point to ISE as RADIUS servers and you should have multiple RADIUS definitions for redundancy.&amp;nbsp; Do you have the HQ and remote PSN listed in the radius group on the VPN device?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If you have both defined in the RADIUS group and the HQ device failed at some point the VPN device might have failed over to the remote PSN.&amp;nbsp; Some network devices don't fail back to the first RADIUS servers in their list.&amp;nbsp; They will keep using the same RADIUS server as long as it is working.&amp;nbsp; Cisco WLCs by default don't fail back to the primary server in their list.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2020 22:49:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/vpn-users-authenticate-with-remote-psn/m-p/4089660#M560561</guid>
      <dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-20T22:49:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

