<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ISE compatibility with MDM Silverback in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-compatibility-with-mdm-silverback/m-p/4092110#M560684</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;we want to establish a connection to an external MDM Server, that is &lt;STRONG&gt;Matrix42 Silverback&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;BR /&gt;Someone has experience with Matrix42 Silverback and its integration with ISE (Version 2.6)?&lt;BR /&gt;Are they compatible?&lt;BR /&gt;Can we use APIs?&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks in advance&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2020 12:54:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>a-l-e-x</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-05-26T12:54:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ISE compatibility with MDM Silverback</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-compatibility-with-mdm-silverback/m-p/4092110#M560684</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;we want to establish a connection to an external MDM Server, that is &lt;STRONG&gt;Matrix42 Silverback&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;BR /&gt;Someone has experience with Matrix42 Silverback and its integration with ISE (Version 2.6)?&lt;BR /&gt;Are they compatible?&lt;BR /&gt;Can we use APIs?&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks in advance&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2020 12:54:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-compatibility-with-mdm-silverback/m-p/4092110#M560684</guid>
      <dc:creator>a-l-e-x</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-26T12:54:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE compatibility with MDM Silverback</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-compatibility-with-mdm-silverback/m-p/4092590#M560705</link>
      <description>Hi&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;This MDM isn’t part of validated MDM, even on 2.7 version: &lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/ise/2-7/compatibility_doc/b_ise_sdt_27.html#mdmservers" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/ise/2-7/compatibility_doc/b_ise_sdt_27.html#mdmservers&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;This doesn’t mean it won’t work but you have to test it. I personally never heard of that one before today &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2020 04:43:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-compatibility-with-mdm-silverback/m-p/4092590#M560705</guid>
      <dc:creator>Francesco Molino</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-27T04:43:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE compatibility with MDM Silverback</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-compatibility-with-mdm-silverback/m-p/4092885#M560713</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Silverback is not (yet) an official &lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/m/en_us/products/security/technical-alliance-partners.html" target="_self"&gt;Cisco Security Technical Alliance (CSTA) Partner&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This means they likely do not implement the ISE MDM API and therefore cannot work with ISE.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2020 15:07:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-compatibility-with-mdm-silverback/m-p/4092885#M560713</guid>
      <dc:creator>thomas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-27T15:07:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

