<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Redirection Based Posture in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/redirection-based-posture/m-p/4102765#M561188</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1059785"&gt;@ISEduo&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Since redirection is not happening on the switch, let's check a couple of things:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;OL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Do you have Dynamic-Author configured on the switch?&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Are you seeing the end-user's IP address in the output of 'show auth session inter Gi x/y detail' ?&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Are you seeing any packets from the end-user's IP address (take packet captures on the PSN)?&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/OL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If you are able to resolve enroll.cisco.com, that's great. The way it will be used is that when the client sends a HTTP-GET request to enroll.cisco.com, it will be redirected by the switch, to the ISE IP.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2020 20:23:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anurag Sharma</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-06-13T20:23:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Redirection Based Posture</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/redirection-based-posture/m-p/4102732#M561187</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi, I am seeing a strange behavior of Anyconnect Posture Module. I am trying to do redirection based Posture scan for my clients and it does not work. For some strange reasons clients says enroll.cisco.com timeout from DART logs. I tested that and I can successfully resolve enroll.cisco.com from the client and access posture portal manually from the client browser. But the Posture modules writes "No Policy Server Detected".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It runs with Anyconnect 4.8 and ISE 2.6&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I activated both ip http and ip http secure on the switch.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My Redirect ACL on SW:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;deny udp any bootpc any eq bootps&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;deny udp any any domain&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;deny ip any host PSN1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;deny ip any host PSN2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;permit tcp any any eq 80&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(I do not see any matches)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;From DART bundle:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2020/06/11 14:00:29 [Information] aciseagent Function: SwiftHttpRunner::http_discovery_callback Thread Id: 0x219C File: c:\temp\build\thehoff\negasonic_mr30.297045120452\negasonic_mr3\posture\ise\libswift\swifthttprunner.cpp Line: 385 Level: info Time out for Redirection target 10.10.10.1.&lt;BR /&gt;2020/06/11 14:00:29 [Information] aciseagent Function: SwiftHttpRunner::http_discovery_callback Thread Id: 0x219C File: c:\temp\build\thehoff\negasonic_mr30.297045120452\negasonic_mr3\posture\ise\libswift\swifthttprunner.cpp Line: 385 Level: info Time out for Redirection target ::.&lt;BR /&gt;2020/06/11 14:00:29 [Information] aciseagent Function: SwiftHttpRunner::http_discovery_callback Thread Id: 0x219C File: c:\temp\build\thehoff\negasonic_mr30.297045120452\negasonic_mr3\posture\ise\libswift\swifthttprunner.cpp Line: 385 Level: info Time out for Redirection target enroll.cisco.com.&lt;BR /&gt;2020/06/11 14:00:29 [Warning] aciseagent Function: ConfigData::loadXMLCfgFile Thread Id: 0x219C File: c:\temp\build\thehoff\negasonic_mr30.297045120452\negasonic_mr3\posture\ise\libnaccommon\configdata.cpp Line: 46 Level: warn ISEPostureCFG.xml not found, using defaults.&lt;BR /&gt;2020/06/11 14:00:29 [Warning] aciseagent Function: SwiftHttpRunner::addPreviouslyConnectedHeadendsToTargetList Thread Id: 0x219C File: c:\temp\build\thehoff\negasonic_mr30.297045120452\negasonic_mr3\posture\ise\libswift\swifthttprunner.cpp Line: 750 Level: warn No previously connected headends found.&lt;BR /&gt;2020/06/11 14:00:29 [Information] aciseagent Function: SwiftHttpRunner::collectMntTargets Thread Id: 0x219C File: c:\temp\build\thehoff\negasonic_mr30.297045120452\negasonic_mr3\posture\ise\libswift\swifthttprunner.cpp Line: 1227 Level: debug Probing MNT stage targets (#1): Ng-Discovery target enroll.cisco.com with path /auth/ng-discovery, .&lt;BR /&gt;2020/06/11 14:00:29 [Information] aciseagent Function: SwiftHttpRunner::probeNextMntTarget Thread Id: 0x219C File: c:\temp\build\thehoff\negasonic_mr30.297045120452\negasonic_mr3\posture\ise\libswift\swifthttprunner.cpp Line: 1456 Level: debug Probing Mnt stage Ng-Discovery target enroll.cisco.com with path /auth/ng-discovery.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2020 18:21:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/redirection-based-posture/m-p/4102732#M561187</guid>
      <dc:creator>ISEduo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-13T18:21:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Redirection Based Posture</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/redirection-based-posture/m-p/4102765#M561188</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1059785"&gt;@ISEduo&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Since redirection is not happening on the switch, let's check a couple of things:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;OL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Do you have Dynamic-Author configured on the switch?&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Are you seeing the end-user's IP address in the output of 'show auth session inter Gi x/y detail' ?&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Are you seeing any packets from the end-user's IP address (take packet captures on the PSN)?&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/OL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If you are able to resolve enroll.cisco.com, that's great. The way it will be used is that when the client sends a HTTP-GET request to enroll.cisco.com, it will be redirected by the switch, to the ISE IP.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2020 20:23:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/redirection-based-posture/m-p/4102765#M561188</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anurag Sharma</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-13T20:23:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Redirection Based Posture</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/redirection-based-posture/m-p/4102767#M561189</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Anurag,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;See my answers below.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Do you have Dynamic-Author configured on the switch? &lt;STRONG&gt;Yes&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Are you seeing the end-user's IP address in the output of 'show auth session inter Gi x/y detail' ? &lt;STRONG&gt;Yes, I do. I also see the session ID and URL for the portal.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Are you seeing any packets from the end-user's IP address (take packet captures on the PSN)? &lt;STRONG&gt;I dident test this.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Thanks !&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2020 20:50:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/redirection-based-posture/m-p/4102767#M561189</guid>
      <dc:creator>ISEduo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-13T20:50:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Redirection Based Posture</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/redirection-based-posture/m-p/4102776#M561191</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Make sure the redirect ACL name is exactly the same as the one on the switch. Any typo, upper/lower-case mismatch can also be a problem.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2020 21:33:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/redirection-based-posture/m-p/4102776#M561191</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anurag Sharma</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-13T21:33:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Redirection Based Posture</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/redirection-based-posture/m-p/4102784#M561192</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;OK. Seems to be correct on both ends.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are these two lines mandatory for the switch?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip http active-session-modules none&lt;BR /&gt;ip http secure-active-session-modules none&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2020 22:20:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/redirection-based-posture/m-p/4102784#M561192</guid>
      <dc:creator>ISEduo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-13T22:20:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

