<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ISE add PSN node in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-add-psn-node/m-p/4137848#M562401</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; We have 3695 ISE HA configured Admin-PSN-MNT, and planning to add 2x3965 PSNs with cluster mode and is that possible right that mixing Large and Medium deployments.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2020 05:37:21 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>TM13</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-08-19T05:37:21Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ISE add PSN node</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-add-psn-node/m-p/4137848#M562401</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; We have 3695 ISE HA configured Admin-PSN-MNT, and planning to add 2x3965 PSNs with cluster mode and is that possible right that mixing Large and Medium deployments.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2020 05:37:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-add-psn-node/m-p/4137848#M562401</guid>
      <dc:creator>TM13</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-08-19T05:37:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE add PSN node</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-add-psn-node/m-p/4137898#M562404</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;- Moved to &lt;STRONG&gt;Network Access Control&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;M.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2020 07:28:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-add-psn-node/m-p/4137898#M562404</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark Elsen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-08-19T07:28:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE add PSN node</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-add-psn-node/m-p/4138184#M562410</link>
      <description>Yes you can mix different size ISE appliances and VM's within the same deployment. You just have to be mindful of the scaling limitations of each platform and plan accordingly. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'm just assume you might have meant to say you have two 3595's running PAN/MNT/PSN in what we refer to as a 2 node standalone deployment? If so, then you will be going to a four node hybrid deployment when you add two more nodes. In a four node deployment, the guidance is to only run the PAN/MNT function on two nodes, then the PSN roles on the two you are adding.  &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Ideally you would swap the new nodes in and finish up with a deployment that looks like this.&lt;BR /&gt;2x 3695 = PAN/MNT roles enabled&lt;BR /&gt;2x 3595 = PSN role enabled</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2020 16:04:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-add-psn-node/m-p/4138184#M562410</guid>
      <dc:creator>Damien Miller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-08-19T16:04:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE add PSN node</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-add-psn-node/m-p/4138422#M562415</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Tulga,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;To add to what &lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/320219"&gt;@Damien Miller&lt;/a&gt; stated, there are strict support guidelines for ISE deployment models. See the following document for those guidelines - &lt;A href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-add-psn-node/m-p/4137848" target="_self"&gt;ISE Performance &amp;amp; Scale&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If you have a Standalone deployment (PSN, MnT, and PSN on the same node) and want to add PSNs, you need to move to a Hybrid model at a minimum (2x PAN/MnT + 2x PSN).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Unless I'm mistaken, I believe you are working in an environment with a Converged Plantwide Ethernet (CPwE) architecture. In that case, you should design for a minimum of six nodes to support the IT/OT separation defined in the Purdue model for Industrial Control Systems:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;2x PAN/MnT&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;2x PSNs for the Enterprise (IT) environment (in the Enterprise Security zone)&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;2x PSNs for the Process Control (OT) environment (in the Industrial DMZ zone)&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You could further improve scalability and performance by separating the PAN &amp;amp; MnT personas onto Dedicated nodes.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2020 00:03:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-add-psn-node/m-p/4138422#M562415</guid>
      <dc:creator>Greg Gibbs</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-08-20T00:03:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

