https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/reducing-failover-times/m-p/4147270#M562726 <P>Hello</P> <P>&nbsp;</P> <P>Have you looked at this <A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/ios-nx-os-software/identity-based-networking-services/whitepaper_C11-731907.html" target="_self">excellent whitepaper</A> ? I have not seen many attempts in the field to tune this correctly - mostly always left at defaults and then failover times are hit and miss. I will be paying closer attention to this myself in future.</P> <P>&nbsp;</P> <P>&nbsp;</P> Mon, 07 Sep 2020 11:13:57 GMT Arne Bier 2020-09-07T11:13:57Z https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/reducing-failover-times/m-p/4145316#M562653 <P>Looking for documentation on best practices for reducing endpoint failover times. Customer is using ISE for TACACS and Radius in a hybrid design (no LB).&nbsp; Default settings can take over a minute for auths to fail to secondary PSN and we would like to get times much lower. Thanks in advance!</P> Thu, 03 Sep 2020 13:04:11 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/reducing-failover-times/m-p/4145316#M562653 darryldigsit 2020-09-03T13:04:11Z https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/reducing-failover-times/m-p/4147270#M562726 <P>Hello</P> <P>&nbsp;</P> <P>Have you looked at this <A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/ios-nx-os-software/identity-based-networking-services/whitepaper_C11-731907.html" target="_self">excellent whitepaper</A> ? I have not seen many attempts in the field to tune this correctly - mostly always left at defaults and then failover times are hit and miss. I will be paying closer attention to this myself in future.</P> <P>&nbsp;</P> <P>&nbsp;</P> Mon, 07 Sep 2020 11:13:57 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/reducing-failover-times/m-p/4147270#M562726 Arne Bier 2020-09-07T11:13:57Z