<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic NAC Implementation maturity process in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/nac-implementation-maturity-process/m-p/4192619#M564134</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Guys&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can any of the NAC experts on here give me a walkthrough of what a good implementation looks like.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For example, in my head I would have&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1.Define what policies you want to implement&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2.Discovery, how long would you leave it to discover, a few months ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3.Iron out and identify any unknown devices&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4.Switch on controls&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;5.Start to segment Corporate from OT/IoT&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;6.Start to look at remediation and integration with AV/Windows etc&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is my idea, what is everyone else doing? and in what timeline?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2020 08:37:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>carl_townshend</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-12-03T08:37:39Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>NAC Implementation maturity process</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/nac-implementation-maturity-process/m-p/4192619#M564134</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Guys&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can any of the NAC experts on here give me a walkthrough of what a good implementation looks like.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For example, in my head I would have&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1.Define what policies you want to implement&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2.Discovery, how long would you leave it to discover, a few months ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3.Iron out and identify any unknown devices&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4.Switch on controls&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;5.Start to segment Corporate from OT/IoT&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;6.Start to look at remediation and integration with AV/Windows etc&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is my idea, what is everyone else doing? and in what timeline?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2020 08:37:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/nac-implementation-maturity-process/m-p/4192619#M564134</guid>
      <dc:creator>carl_townshend</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-12-03T08:37:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NAC Implementation maturity process</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/nac-implementation-maturity-process/m-p/4192698#M564139</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;There are more steps - several books and many Cisco Live presentations cover ISE deployments so it doesn't make sense to try to condense them here.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Design is an important step to combine with your requirements. Only with those in hand can you create policies in the NAC (ISE).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Discovery can last anywhere from days for a small network to months for a large one.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We typically move from Monitor mode to Low Impact and then to Closed. Many organizations stop with Low impact mode.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Your step 6 assumes Posture (e.g. ISE Apex). Not everybody chooses to go that far as their requirements are met with a Base level of functionality.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2020 11:15:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/nac-implementation-maturity-process/m-p/4192698#M564139</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marvin Rhoads</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-12-03T11:15:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

