<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Basic 2-node deployment in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/basic-2-node-deployment/m-p/4193501#M564171</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;If you happen to have 2x SNS-3695 appliances, then you could run a 2 node HA deployment that supports 50k active endpoints. In this scenario you would have to have the SNS-3695 256 GB nodes, and you would have to order another 25k endpoint licenses.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Or you can run two separate single node deployments with no HA. Again, you would still need to order another 25k endpoint licenses.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;Deployment 1: 1x 3655 = 25k active sessions&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Deployment 2: 1x 3655 = 25k active sessions&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Since you only have 25k endpoint licenses, you will run in to licensing issues in both scenarios unless you order additional.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2020 15:05:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Damien Miller</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-12-04T15:05:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Basic 2-node deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/basic-2-node-deployment/m-p/4193360#M564163</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello All&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The current demand for Sessions requires a total of 50,000&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My device is Model for SNS 3600, a total of two&lt;BR /&gt;Buy a license for 25000 Sessions&lt;BR /&gt;I set up the two deployments, can it reach Sessions 50000&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2020 10:59:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/basic-2-node-deployment/m-p/4193360#M564163</guid>
      <dc:creator>Hung_lin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-12-04T10:59:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Basic 2-node deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/basic-2-node-deployment/m-p/4193501#M564171</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If you happen to have 2x SNS-3695 appliances, then you could run a 2 node HA deployment that supports 50k active endpoints. In this scenario you would have to have the SNS-3695 256 GB nodes, and you would have to order another 25k endpoint licenses.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Or you can run two separate single node deployments with no HA. Again, you would still need to order another 25k endpoint licenses.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;Deployment 1: 1x 3655 = 25k active sessions&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Deployment 2: 1x 3655 = 25k active sessions&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Since you only have 25k endpoint licenses, you will run in to licensing issues in both scenarios unless you order additional.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2020 15:05:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/basic-2-node-deployment/m-p/4193501#M564171</guid>
      <dc:creator>Damien Miller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-12-04T15:05:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Basic 2-node deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/basic-2-node-deployment/m-p/4194892#M564212</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi sir,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So, if I integrate the SLB device to divide the authentication session per unit (PSN) not more than 25,000, then two sns-3655 deployments (HA) cannot support a total of 50,000?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2020 02:03:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/basic-2-node-deployment/m-p/4194892#M564212</guid>
      <dc:creator>ezxw78128</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-12-08T02:03:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Basic 2-node deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/basic-2-node-deployment/m-p/4194908#M564213</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If you were to keep the two nodes independent and not join the two ISE nodes together, they could each support 25k. Together as a high availability pair, they only support 25k active sessions.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;In this scenario, configuration would have to be done on both admin nodes separately, logging would be independent on each node, and if a node were to fail, you do not have a secondary to act as a backup from a configuration standpoint. They would not know about each other. The network devices (switch/wlc etc) would be configured with the two separate ise "deployments", where each deployment was a single node.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2020 04:16:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/basic-2-node-deployment/m-p/4194908#M564213</guid>
      <dc:creator>Damien Miller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-12-08T04:16:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

