<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ISE failover impact in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-failover-impact/m-p/4194706#M564210</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;Marvin&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;, it worked but it took more time than what you have mentioned for syncing and&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;initiating.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Between 00:45 m to 1 Hour. for moving back to the primary.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2020 18:27:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>hussainmajeed87</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-12-07T18:27:39Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ISE failover impact</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-failover-impact/m-p/4191641#M564109</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;We have a power outage last week and the primary ISE went down, but the 2ndary didn't kick in, so we had to do it manually to promote to primary, the process took 1 hour and 30 minutes for&amp;nbsp;initiating the services to be back in running mode.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we face some RAM issues on the 2ndary server and it was slow to back online.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So, after the outage, the primary comes back online but it is showing as a role secondary.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In case we need to push it back as primary, my questions are:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;How long is going to take for the Failover? &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;What is the impact? &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;As of the second server is running, is the authentication/clients/tacac.s will get disconnected or fail?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;current services are:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Node-1 - Primary - (Role-&lt;SPAN&gt;Secondary &lt;/SPAN&gt;)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Node-2 - Secondary - (Role- Primary )&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2020 20:36:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-failover-impact/m-p/4191641#M564109</guid>
      <dc:creator>hussainmajeed87</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-12-01T20:36:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE failover impact</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-failover-impact/m-p/4191844#M564110</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;What version of ISE are you running?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If you go to Administration &amp;gt; System &amp;gt; Deployment and then click on PAN Failover, is the Enable Auto PAN Failover&amp;nbsp; button selected?&amp;nbsp; If not select it and fill out the required fields and click save.&amp;nbsp; Your PAN and MNT nodes should now failover automatically.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2020 08:30:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-failover-impact/m-p/4191844#M564110</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marius Gunnerud</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-12-02T08:30:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE failover impact</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-failover-impact/m-p/4191994#M564111</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/319690"&gt;@Marius Gunnerud&lt;/a&gt; don't we need a third node to monitor PAN health in order to perform automatic failover? The OP indicated he has only a 2-node deployment.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Even with automatic failover using a third node there is no concept of preemption so failback has to be done manually.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRIKE&gt;If the deployment is 2 nodes, the PSN role should be running on both and a failover or failback should only take place on one unit at a time so the other PSN persona should always be available to service new authentications.&lt;/STRIKE&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Also see this good article:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://bluenetsec.com/promote-ise-secondary-pan-to-become-the-primary/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://bluenetsec.com/promote-ise-secondary-pan-to-become-the-primary/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2020 01:44:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-failover-impact/m-p/4191994#M564111</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marvin Rhoads</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-12-03T01:44:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE failover impact</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-failover-impact/m-p/4192050#M564114</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;That is correct&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/326046"&gt;@Marvin Rhoads&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;a third node needs to be present to monitor heartbeats.&amp;nbsp; Overlooked the two node setup.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2020 13:45:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-failover-impact/m-p/4192050#M564114</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marius Gunnerud</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-12-02T13:45:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE failover impact</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-failover-impact/m-p/4192194#M564120</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We are running on 2.6.0 156&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have checked the PAN and the PAN auto-failover is not enabled, and it could be the reason why didn't fail automatically.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In case we need to push it back as primary, my questions are:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;How long is going to take for the Failover?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;What is the impact?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;As of the second server is running, is the authentication/clients/tacac.s will get disconnected or fail?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2020 16:32:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-failover-impact/m-p/4192194#M564120</guid>
      <dc:creator>hussainmajeed87</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-12-02T16:32:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE failover impact</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-failover-impact/m-p/4192204#M564121</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRIKE&gt;Please see my earlier reply for details on impact.&lt;/STRIKE&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRIKE&gt;As long as one server is active (and assuming your network access devices are correctly configured to use both PSNs for AAA services) end users should not be affected during failover.&lt;/STRIKE&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Update: I believe the 2-node scenario will result in both PSNs being unavailable for a period. In that case, new authentications will not be possible until one of the PSNs comes back up.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The process takes about 15-20 minutes. If I were planning a maintenance window, I would plan for an hour or two and hope to finish early. &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2020 01:43:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-failover-impact/m-p/4192204#M564121</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marvin Rhoads</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-12-03T01:43:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE failover impact</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-failover-impact/m-p/4192350#M564126</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you, Marvin, we will try and share the result.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2020 20:10:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-failover-impact/m-p/4192350#M564126</guid>
      <dc:creator>hussainmajeed87</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-12-02T20:10:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE failover impact</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-failover-impact/m-p/4194706#M564210</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;Marvin&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;, it worked but it took more time than what you have mentioned for syncing and&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;initiating.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Between 00:45 m to 1 Hour. for moving back to the primary.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2020 18:27:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-failover-impact/m-p/4194706#M564210</guid>
      <dc:creator>hussainmajeed87</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-12-07T18:27:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

