<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Alternatives to Cisco ISE? in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/alternatives-to-cisco-ise/m-p/4264066#M564484</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Has anyone out there got any good ideas or experiences with alternative NACs instead of ISE?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Has anyone wished they had never used ISE and used another solution instead?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am starting from scratch in terms of finding a NAC solution and wonder if ISE is the best or maybe something like FortiNAC could be better?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2020 12:33:08 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>chris.george</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-12-27T12:33:08Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Alternatives to Cisco ISE?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/alternatives-to-cisco-ise/m-p/4264066#M564484</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Has anyone out there got any good ideas or experiences with alternative NACs instead of ISE?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Has anyone wished they had never used ISE and used another solution instead?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am starting from scratch in terms of finding a NAC solution and wonder if ISE is the best or maybe something like FortiNAC could be better?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2020 12:33:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/alternatives-to-cisco-ise/m-p/4264066#M564484</guid>
      <dc:creator>chris.george</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-12-27T12:33:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Alternatives to Cisco ISE?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/alternatives-to-cisco-ise/m-p/4264077#M564485</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.gartner.com/reviews/market/network-access-control" target="_self"&gt;Gartner&amp;nbsp;Network Access Control (NAC) Reviews and Ratings&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2020 13:33:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/alternatives-to-cisco-ise/m-p/4264077#M564485</guid>
      <dc:creator>Leo Laohoo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-12-27T13:33:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Alternatives to Cisco ISE?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/alternatives-to-cisco-ise/m-p/4264738#M564498</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;ISE is the best, and it's the market leader because of that. It may not be the simplest solution, but any feature rich product becomes more complicated and nuanced.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2020 14:40:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/alternatives-to-cisco-ise/m-p/4264738#M564498</guid>
      <dc:creator>Damien Miller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-12-29T14:40:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Alternatives to Cisco ISE?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/alternatives-to-cisco-ise/m-p/4267401#M564579</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I second what&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/320219"&gt;@Damien Miller&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;said about ISE. It has a bit of a steep learning curve, but over time you learn to love it (warts and all). I have worked with other products too, but I always come back to ISE.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;By comparison, Aruba Clearpass (CPPM) is completely different to ISE - it seems to require less resources than ISE but that's because CPPM doesn't have half the features ISE has. The config logic is quite different to ISE - I prefer ISE to CPPM. And BTW, both products are equally buggy ... sorry, they have equal amounts of "software defects" &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;FreeRADIUS sounds tempting - it's free and runs on raspberry pi - how nice - BUT - you will need to edit all the text files by hand and this might not appeal to you if all you want to do is learn RADIUS. There is apparently a GUI available but requires further hackery. I'd say FreeRADIUS is a labour of love and some people swear by it - but it's RADIUS only ... not much help if you have to integrate with DNAC etc. Again ... ISE is the best &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Other products like Radiator and Cisco's own Prime Access Registrar are great products - (RADIUS only) and very hard working tools for hard core applications - but mostly editing text files. If you want simplicity (especially if you're a full-stack engineer) then you will love ISE.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I always recommend &lt;A href="http://www.labminutes.com" target="_blank"&gt;www.labminutes.com&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;series to learn about things like ISE and other great Cisco stuff (SDA is also very good) - just watch and learn. And practise! Build a small lab and gain experience. You have to train that "ISE muscle" and you'll never look back.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2021 21:32:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/alternatives-to-cisco-ise/m-p/4267401#M564579</guid>
      <dc:creator>Arne Bier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-05T21:32:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

