<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Best practice to secure port-channel interfaces not supporting 802.1x on access switches in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/best-practice-to-secure-port-channel-interfaces-not-supporting/m-p/4305630#M566055</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;IOS and XE switches doesn't seem to support 802.1x on etherchannel interfaces. What is the best practice/recommendation to secure these ports (etherchannel interfaces) to stop someone from plugging in unauthorized devices?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2021 13:38:26 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Madura Malwatte</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-03-11T13:38:26Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Best practice to secure port-channel interfaces not supporting 802.1x on access switches</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/best-practice-to-secure-port-channel-interfaces-not-supporting/m-p/4305630#M566055</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;IOS and XE switches doesn't seem to support 802.1x on etherchannel interfaces. What is the best practice/recommendation to secure these ports (etherchannel interfaces) to stop someone from plugging in unauthorized devices?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2021 13:38:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/best-practice-to-secure-port-channel-interfaces-not-supporting/m-p/4305630#M566055</guid>
      <dc:creator>Madura Malwatte</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-03-11T13:38:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Best practice to secure port-channel interfaces not supporting 802.1x on access switches</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/best-practice-to-secure-port-channel-interfaces-not-supporting/m-p/4305654#M566058</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I think you can use a switch-port security by static/sticky mac address learning.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But only, when port isn't trunk but access.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If someone plug in with wrong mac adress, port should be disabled.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Other config to apply should be MACsec.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2021 14:07:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/best-practice-to-secure-port-channel-interfaces-not-supporting/m-p/4305654#M566058</guid>
      <dc:creator>Filip Po</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-03-11T14:07:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Best practice to secure port-channel interfaces not supporting 802.1x on access switches</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/best-practice-to-secure-port-channel-interfaces-not-supporting/m-p/4305944#M566075</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/147749"&gt;@Madura Malwatte&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;IOS and XE switches doesn't seem to support 802.1x on etherchannel interfaces.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Etherchannel ports should never support 802.1x.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/147749"&gt;@Madura Malwatte&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;What is the best practice/recommendation to secure these ports (etherchannel interfaces) to stop someone from plugging in unauthorized devices?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Most important is if any person can physically access the access switches then it is "game over".&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Lock the cabinets down to stop people from unpatching ethterchannel connection(s) to other ports.&amp;nbsp; Put CCTV to make sure people are identified correctly.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2021 21:07:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/best-practice-to-secure-port-channel-interfaces-not-supporting/m-p/4305944#M566075</guid>
      <dc:creator>Leo Laohoo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-03-11T21:07:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

