<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: CIsco ISE upgrade decrease in node size in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise-upgrade-decrease-in-node-size/m-p/4400240#M567220</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/17232"&gt;@Marcelo Morais&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks for the reply. The only slight concern is with backup and restore from a 4 node cluster into a 2 node cluster. Not to sure if this can be done as its not like for like&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2021 13:00:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>bernards</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-05-10T13:00:24Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>CIsco ISE upgrade decrease in node size</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise-upgrade-decrease-in-node-size/m-p/4400132#M567213</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Has anyone upgraded from a 4 node ISE cluster with Primary and secondary Admin/Mnt nodes and two PSN nodes to the following&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2 node cluster with primary/secondary Admin/Mnt/PSN persona&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is the best way to do a fresh build and config or will backup and restore work from a 4 node cluster to a new 2 node cluster&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2021 09:14:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise-upgrade-decrease-in-node-size/m-p/4400132#M567213</guid>
      <dc:creator>bernards</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-05-10T09:14:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CIsco ISE upgrade decrease in node size</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise-upgrade-decrease-in-node-size/m-p/4400192#M567215</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/256646"&gt;@bernards&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;a &lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/ise/2-7/upgrade_guide/Upgrade_Journey/HTML/b_upgrade_method_2_7.html" target="_blank"&gt;Backup &amp;amp; Restore&lt;/A&gt; is the recommended method.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;Please take a look at: &lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/ise/2-7/upgrade_guide/Upgrade_Journey/HTML/b_upgrade_method_2_7.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Cisco ISE 2.7 Upgrade Guide - Upgrade Method&lt;/A&gt;, search for&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;Upgrade Cisco ISE Deployment Using Backup and Restore Method (Recommended)&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps !!!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2021 11:29:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise-upgrade-decrease-in-node-size/m-p/4400192#M567215</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marcelo Morais</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-05-10T11:29:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CIsco ISE upgrade decrease in node size</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise-upgrade-decrease-in-node-size/m-p/4400240#M567220</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/17232"&gt;@Marcelo Morais&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks for the reply. The only slight concern is with backup and restore from a 4 node cluster into a 2 node cluster. Not to sure if this can be done as its not like for like&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2021 13:00:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise-upgrade-decrease-in-node-size/m-p/4400240#M567220</guid>
      <dc:creator>bernards</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-05-10T13:00:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CIsco ISE upgrade decrease in node size</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise-upgrade-decrease-in-node-size/m-p/4400333#M567221</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;From an ISE perspective this can actually be quite easy. You can just enable the PSN persona on the current Admin/Monitoring nodes. Once that's done, you can migrate a few NADs to test, and if all goes well, migrate all the rest.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Once all of the NADs are using the new PAN/MNT/PSN combo nodes, you can decommission the two PSNs you no longer want.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Officially speaking, a four node/four psn deployment is not supported, but it works and migration activities such as this are the only time I would recommend it since you won't be keeping it that way.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The other option is to resize your PSN disk space with a fresh install of those two nodes, then inline upgrade everything as is, ending off by enabling the admin/MNT on the existing PSNs. This would mean you don't have to migrate the NADs to use new radius server IPs. Since you need 600+ gb disk space, your PSNs might need more, hence the reinstall that might be required.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2021 15:10:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise-upgrade-decrease-in-node-size/m-p/4400333#M567221</guid>
      <dc:creator>Damien Miller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-05-10T15:10:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CIsco ISE upgrade decrease in node size</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise-upgrade-decrease-in-node-size/m-p/4400334#M567222</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I see what you are getting at.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Surely it will say there are 2 missing nodes, which you should be able to delete.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've got to do this in few weeks time from 6 psn to 4 psn&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cheers&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2021 15:13:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise-upgrade-decrease-in-node-size/m-p/4400334#M567222</guid>
      <dc:creator>craiglebutt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-05-10T15:13:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CIsco ISE upgrade decrease in node size</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise-upgrade-decrease-in-node-size/m-p/4400819#M567232</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/320219"&gt;@Damien Miller&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the reply&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I did think that this could be the only way forward. Once done I suppose a few network changes then will point to the different addresses for the new 2 node PSN cluster.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I will post the outcome of the migration for reference once complete&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2021 06:22:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise-upgrade-decrease-in-node-size/m-p/4400819#M567232</guid>
      <dc:creator>bernards</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-05-11T06:22:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

