<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic RDP vs direct access distinguish on ISE in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/rdp-vs-direct-access-distinguish-on-ise/m-p/4429688#M568365</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear community,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a way to distinguish RDP access form from direct access on Windows supplicants from ISE? This in order to be able to apply different rules for both use Cases.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any though would be highly appreciated. .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Laura&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2021 07:39:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>laurathaqi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-07-08T07:39:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>RDP vs direct access distinguish on ISE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/rdp-vs-direct-access-distinguish-on-ise/m-p/4429688#M568365</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear community,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a way to distinguish RDP access form from direct access on Windows supplicants from ISE? This in order to be able to apply different rules for both use Cases.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any though would be highly appreciated. .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Laura&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2021 07:39:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/rdp-vs-direct-access-distinguish-on-ise/m-p/4429688#M568365</guid>
      <dc:creator>laurathaqi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-08T07:39:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RDP vs direct access distinguish on ISE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/rdp-vs-direct-access-distinguish-on-ise/m-p/4429927#M568369</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Microsoft does not treat RDP logins as normal user logins and therefore does not trigger an 802.1X authentication event for an RDP login. The switch or wireless controller should not receive an EAP-Start message from a Windows workstation when you login via RDP.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You may consider using the Cisco AnyConnect NAM module which provides the functionality you desire.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Here is another article stating the same:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.ise-support.com/2019/02/05/windows-rdp-and-802-1x-authentications/" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.ise-support.com/2019/02/05/windows-rdp-and-802-1x-authentications/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2021 14:24:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/rdp-vs-direct-access-distinguish-on-ise/m-p/4429927#M568369</guid>
      <dc:creator>thomas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-08T14:24:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

