<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Is using Default redundant in aaa commands? in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/is-using-default-redundant-in-aaa-commands/m-p/4515736#M571563</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;In your case the default is redundant because you have a method list called "VTY" that is explicitly configured under the vty line 0 4&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;And the "&lt;SPAN&gt;group tacacs+" is also a more generic syntaxt that is not recommended when you want to be more specific about the exact TACACS+ group that you have defined (i.e. ISE_TACACS). The "group tacacs+" is convenient in some cases because it's relaxed (and lazy) and somewhat futureproof if you changed the group name. But I tend to use the Group Name for TACACS+ and RADIUS.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2021 04:52:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Arne Bier</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-12-09T04:52:38Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Is using Default redundant in aaa commands?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/is-using-default-redundant-in-aaa-commands/m-p/4511927#M571369</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;for example i have this template:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;aaa authentication login VTY group ISE_TACACS local&lt;BR /&gt;aaa authorization config-commands&lt;BR /&gt;aaa authorization exec default group tacacs+ if-authenticated&lt;BR /&gt;aaa authorization exec VTY group ISE_TACACS local if-authenticated&lt;BR /&gt;aaa authorization commands 1 default group ISE_TACACS if-authenticated&lt;BR /&gt;aaa authorization commands 1 VTY group ISE_TACACS local if-authenticated&lt;BR /&gt;aaa authorization commands 15 default group ISE_TACACS if-authenticated&lt;BR /&gt;aaa authorization commands 15 VTY group ISE_TACACS local if-authenticated&lt;BR /&gt;aaa accounting update periodic 5&lt;BR /&gt;aaa accounting exec default start-stop group ISE_TACACS&lt;BR /&gt;aaa accounting commands 1 default start-stop group ISE_TACACS&lt;BR /&gt;aaa accounting commands 1 VTY start-stop group ISE_TACACS&lt;BR /&gt;aaa accounting commands 15 default start-stop group ISE_TACACS&lt;BR /&gt;aaa accounting commands 15 VTY start-stop group ISE_TACACS&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;line vty 0 4&lt;BR /&gt;authorization commands 1 VTY&lt;BR /&gt;authorization commands 15 VTY&lt;BR /&gt;authorization exec VTY&lt;BR /&gt;login authentication VTY&lt;BR /&gt;logging synchronous&lt;BR /&gt;transport input ssh&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;========================================================&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;from my understanding default is applied to all lines if nothing under VTY line, whats the difference between these&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;two&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;aaa authorization exec default group tacacs+ if-authenticated&amp;nbsp; : does this command check the ISE_TACACS group also?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;what plain tacacs+ means&lt;BR /&gt;aaa authorization exec VTY group ISE_TACACS local if-authenticated&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2021 14:12:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/is-using-default-redundant-in-aaa-commands/m-p/4511927#M571369</guid>
      <dc:creator>enzo80</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-12-02T14:12:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is using Default redundant in aaa commands?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/is-using-default-redundant-in-aaa-commands/m-p/4515736#M571563</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;In your case the default is redundant because you have a method list called "VTY" that is explicitly configured under the vty line 0 4&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;And the "&lt;SPAN&gt;group tacacs+" is also a more generic syntaxt that is not recommended when you want to be more specific about the exact TACACS+ group that you have defined (i.e. ISE_TACACS). The "group tacacs+" is convenient in some cases because it's relaxed (and lazy) and somewhat futureproof if you changed the group name. But I tend to use the Group Name for TACACS+ and RADIUS.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2021 04:52:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/is-using-default-redundant-in-aaa-commands/m-p/4515736#M571563</guid>
      <dc:creator>Arne Bier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-12-09T04:52:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

