<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic WLC(s) will talk to the PSNs. in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise-implementation-and-design/m-p/2755152#M57164</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;WLC(s) will talk to the PSNs. This is what you should consider when planning&amp;nbsp;PSN locations.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Where do you want to place the WLCs? Only in the DC or on each remote site?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2015 15:42:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Peter Koltl</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-10-14T15:42:53Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Cisco ISE implementation and Design</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise-implementation-and-design/m-p/2755151#M57163</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Everyone,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am seeking your expert advice on design and implementation of CISCO ISE in my network.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am planning to install Cisco ISE appliances in my Datacentre and Remote sites. There will be a three remote sites and once datacentre, I want to provide authentication for Guest and corporate wireless users that should be authenticated through ISE.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But I want to authenticate both traffic through local remote site PSN, I am not able to understand that How WLC will handles this traffic for each PSN.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Response will be highly appreciated!!.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mandhir Mehta&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 06:09:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise-implementation-and-design/m-p/2755151#M57163</guid>
      <dc:creator>mandhir_mehta</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T06:09:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WLC(s) will talk to the PSNs.</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise-implementation-and-design/m-p/2755152#M57164</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;WLC(s) will talk to the PSNs. This is what you should consider when planning&amp;nbsp;PSN locations.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Where do you want to place the WLCs? Only in the DC or on each remote site?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2015 15:42:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise-implementation-and-design/m-p/2755152#M57164</guid>
      <dc:creator>Peter Koltl</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-10-14T15:42:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I would really advise you to</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise-implementation-and-design/m-p/2755153#M57165</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I would really advise you to get in touch with a local Cisco partner for this. ISE can be quite difficult to get right, especially if this is your first attempt.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2015 18:31:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise-implementation-and-design/m-p/2755153#M57165</guid>
      <dc:creator>jan.nielsen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-10-14T18:31:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thanks Peter for your</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise-implementation-and-design/m-p/2755154#M57167</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks Peter for your response.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;WLC will be deployed cetralised at DC.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2015 08:05:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise-implementation-and-design/m-p/2755154#M57167</guid>
      <dc:creator>mandhir_mehta</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-10-15T08:05:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Then I see no reason for any</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise-implementation-and-design/m-p/2755155#M57169</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Then I see no reason for any PSNs on remote locations.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2015 20:47:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise-implementation-and-design/m-p/2755155#M57169</guid>
      <dc:creator>Peter Koltl</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-10-15T20:47:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

