<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Patch difference in deployment mode - Cisco ISE in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/patch-difference-in-deployment-mode-cisco-ise/m-p/4521500#M571838</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1197779"&gt;@JoseAlanis07669&lt;/a&gt; no, you should run the same patch version across all nodes in your ISE cluster. I doubt Cisco even supports running different patches on the ISE nodes.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2021 09:56:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Rob Ingram</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-12-20T09:56:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Patch difference in deployment mode - Cisco ISE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/patch-difference-in-deployment-mode-cisco-ise/m-p/4521475#M571837</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello!&lt;BR /&gt;Does anyone know what Cisco's recommendations are about having different patches on my deployment.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My deployment has patch 3 of version 2.x but I am looking to upgrade only one node to patch 6 by CLI.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Will there be any compatibility issues between the rest of the nodes with patch 3 and the node with patch 6?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks and have a nice day!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2021 08:57:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/patch-difference-in-deployment-mode-cisco-ise/m-p/4521475#M571837</guid>
      <dc:creator>JoseAlanis07669</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-12-20T08:57:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Patch difference in deployment mode - Cisco ISE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/patch-difference-in-deployment-mode-cisco-ise/m-p/4521500#M571838</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1197779"&gt;@JoseAlanis07669&lt;/a&gt; no, you should run the same patch version across all nodes in your ISE cluster. I doubt Cisco even supports running different patches on the ISE nodes.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2021 09:56:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/patch-difference-in-deployment-mode-cisco-ise/m-p/4521500#M571838</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rob Ingram</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-12-20T09:56:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Patch difference in deployment mode - Cisco ISE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/patch-difference-in-deployment-mode-cisco-ise/m-p/4521713#M571853</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I've run in to some odd issues when I had a customer stop patching a deployment overnight. I would try to get all nodes on the same patch as quickly as possible starting with the primary admin node.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The CLI won't prevent you from doing a single node, but no one will recommend leaving it in this state or applying it to any node but the PAN first. In a distributed deployment I will usually patch a PSN second after the PAN to test/validate/pause. Then once confirmed things are still working with that node we finish up the patching work.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2021 17:35:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/patch-difference-in-deployment-mode-cisco-ise/m-p/4521713#M571853</guid>
      <dc:creator>Damien Miller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-12-20T17:35:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

