<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Following up with this topic  in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-discontinues-ipn-ipep-functionality/m-p/2751091#M57185</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Following up with this topic , I have ISE 1.3 and I'm doing only wire authentication and posture.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;im ready to deploy the WiFi, however I'm running Motorola wireless .&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;documentation state that I can use IPN, but I was hoping to upgrade to ISE 2.0.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;so how does ISE 2.0 deals with environment without coa?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2016 19:59:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ditmar Tavares</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-03-14T19:59:38Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ISE discontinues IPN/iPEP functionality?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-discontinues-ipn-ipep-functionality/m-p/2751088#M57182</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;All the downloads descriptions&amp;nbsp;for ISE have the following statement in parenthesis "No IPN functionality". &amp;nbsp;I understand that version 2.0 will not have an IPN. &amp;nbsp;Based on the descriptions on the ISE download page the all IPN functionality has been removed for all versions available for download. &amp;nbsp;However, the release notes for 1.4 indicate that IPN 1.2.1 is included with the 1.4 download.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Which way is it? &amp;nbsp;Is IPN gone for everything or is it still an option in the 1.4 download.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I need to migrate from Clean Access to ISE and I can't do so without a CAS equivalent for my older devices that don't support COA.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 06:08:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-discontinues-ipn-ipep-functionality/m-p/2751088#M57182</guid>
      <dc:creator>warnold</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T06:08:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Opps, I misread!  There is</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-discontinues-ipn-ipep-functionality/m-p/2751089#M57183</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Opps, I misread!&amp;nbsp; There is still a version 1.2.1 "IPN Functionality Only" available on the download page under the 1.2.1 listing. &amp;nbsp;Since I will be running 1.4 ISE my IPN will be 1.2.1.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bill&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2015 18:13:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-discontinues-ipn-ipep-functionality/m-p/2751089#M57183</guid>
      <dc:creator>warnold</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-10-12T18:13:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>+5 for answering your own</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-discontinues-ipn-ipep-functionality/m-p/2751090#M57184</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;+5 for answering your own question. &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2015 18:44:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-discontinues-ipn-ipep-functionality/m-p/2751090#M57184</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marvin Rhoads</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-10-12T18:44:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Following up with this topic</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-discontinues-ipn-ipep-functionality/m-p/2751091#M57185</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Following up with this topic , I have ISE 1.3 and I'm doing only wire authentication and posture.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;im ready to deploy the WiFi, however I'm running Motorola wireless .&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;documentation state that I can use IPN, but I was hoping to upgrade to ISE 2.0.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;so how does ISE 2.0 deals with environment without coa?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2016 19:59:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-discontinues-ipn-ipep-functionality/m-p/2751091#M57185</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ditmar Tavares</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-03-14T19:59:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ISE 2.0 supports some third</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-discontinues-ipn-ipep-functionality/m-p/2751092#M57186</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;ISE 2.0 supports some third party devices natively; rather than using the addional node for the IPN. One of the supported devices is Motorola wireless.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Can read more in the release notes http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/ise/2-0/release_notes/ise20_rn.html&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;where some of verified devices are llisted. Also following reference provides detailed technical informaion about this capability&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/security/ise/how_to/HowTo-105-Network_Access_Device_Profiles_with_Cisco_ISE.pdf&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2016 06:16:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-discontinues-ipn-ipep-functionality/m-p/2751092#M57186</guid>
      <dc:creator>jrabinow</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-03-15T06:16:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>the document I believe states</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-discontinues-ipn-ipep-functionality/m-p/2751093#M57187</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;the document I believe states that ISE 2.0 requires NAD to be RFC 5176 compliant which basically mean NAD needs to support CoA.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;IPN was to supports NAD not capable of understanding CoA I believe.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;am I missing anything ? I have Motorol wireless deployed and they don't support NAD, I want to deploy ISE 2.0, am I going to the wrong path ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:34:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-discontinues-ipn-ipep-functionality/m-p/2751093#M57187</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ditmar Tavares</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-03-15T17:34:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Motorola wireless is one of</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-discontinues-ipn-ipep-functionality/m-p/2751094#M57188</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Motorola wireless is one of the devices that has already been verified. Can see in the table in the release notes&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:50:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-discontinues-ipn-ipep-functionality/m-p/2751094#M57188</guid>
      <dc:creator>jrabinow</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-03-15T17:50:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

