<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Authorization policies - Using multiple authorization profiles in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/authorization-policies-using-multiple-authorization-profiles/m-p/4577668#M573639</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is not recommended because it will give you headaches &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Technically it's possible. My guess is that your two profiles will be combined, except the case when the same attribute is defined in both profiles.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BR,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Octavian&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2022 09:30:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Octavian Szolga</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-03-24T09:30:10Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Authorization policies - Using multiple authorization profiles</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/authorization-policies-using-multiple-authorization-profiles/m-p/4577555#M573635</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="helvetica"&gt;Hi Experts,&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="helvetica"&gt;Running ISE 3.1 patch 1.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="helvetica"&gt;Is it possible to have multiple authorization profiles in results with a single authorization policy?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="helvetica"&gt;And if multiple profiles are added, which profile will take precedence?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2022 05:55:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/authorization-policies-using-multiple-authorization-profiles/m-p/4577555#M573635</guid>
      <dc:creator>dgaikwad</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-03-24T05:55:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Authorization policies - Using multiple authorization profiles</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/authorization-policies-using-multiple-authorization-profiles/m-p/4577668#M573639</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is not recommended because it will give you headaches &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Technically it's possible. My guess is that your two profiles will be combined, except the case when the same attribute is defined in both profiles.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BR,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Octavian&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2022 09:30:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/authorization-policies-using-multiple-authorization-profiles/m-p/4577668#M573639</guid>
      <dc:creator>Octavian Szolga</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-03-24T09:30:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Authorization policies - Using multiple authorization profiles</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/authorization-policies-using-multiple-authorization-profiles/m-p/4577734#M573643</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="helvetica"&gt;Thanks for the confirmation, I was thinking on the same lines.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="helvetica"&gt;Thus they can be used, but the effects are not going to be good if combined.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="helvetica"&gt;Thus there could be two authz profiles with two different DACLs and they will combined and applied, right?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2022 11:16:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/authorization-policies-using-multiple-authorization-profiles/m-p/4577734#M573643</guid>
      <dc:creator>dgaikwad</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-03-24T11:16:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Authorization policies - Using multiple authorization profiles</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/authorization-policies-using-multiple-authorization-profiles/m-p/4577741#M573646</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As far as I know, dACLs will not be combined.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BR,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Octavian&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2022 11:24:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/authorization-policies-using-multiple-authorization-profiles/m-p/4577741#M573646</guid>
      <dc:creator>Octavian Szolga</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-03-24T11:24:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Authorization policies - Using multiple authorization profiles</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/authorization-policies-using-multiple-authorization-profiles/m-p/4577837#M573655</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;And if multiple profiles are added, which profile will take precedence?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;-If multiple authz profiles are assigned as result they will be combined and assigned to the session.&amp;nbsp; You can see this via radius live log for the test session.&amp;nbsp; In the live log pay attention to Authorization Result which is found under 'Overview'. to see which multiple authz profiles are assigned to session.&amp;nbsp; Then at the bottom under 'Result' you will see the applied attributes to the session which will show you that the two are combined and applied.&amp;nbsp; Should there be identical attributes configured in both I am pretty sure that the first match will take and be assigned.&amp;nbsp; Lastly, this may assist:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/security-documents/ise-authentication-and-authorization-policy-reference/ta-p/3850472" target="_blank"&gt;ISE Authentication and Authorization Policy Reference - Cisco Community&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2022 13:49:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/authorization-policies-using-multiple-authorization-profiles/m-p/4577837#M573655</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mike.Cifelli</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-03-24T13:49:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Authorization policies - Using multiple authorization profiles</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/authorization-policies-using-multiple-authorization-profiles/m-p/4755531#M579240</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi mike,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;what happens if I apply two different auth profiles at the same auth rule each of one refers to a specific device profile?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Would ise send just the correct device profile?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Marco&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2023 17:28:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/authorization-policies-using-multiple-authorization-profiles/m-p/4755531#M579240</guid>
      <dc:creator>marco.merlo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-01-16T17:28:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Authorization policies - Using multiple authorization profiles</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/authorization-policies-using-multiple-authorization-profiles/m-p/4755554#M579241</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I use it quite often this way as it gives you a great flexibility *and* visibility if you do it the correct way. For example, I have AuthZ profiles that *only* include the assigned VLAN, these have the prefix "VLan_", the AuthZ profiles that include a DACL have the prefix "DACL_" and so on and so on. I didn't count them but I think that in the end the total amount of AuthZ profiles is reduced and the visibility in the AuthZ policy is greatly improved as I directly see what I send to the NAD.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2023 17:57:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/authorization-policies-using-multiple-authorization-profiles/m-p/4755554#M579241</guid>
      <dc:creator>Karsten Iwen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-01-16T17:57:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

