<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ISE Policy Set Question in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-policy-set-question/m-p/4663804#M576554</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Rob&lt;BR /&gt;so .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1.new policy set&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2.Authentication = Radius Nas IP Address + x.x.x.x,&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;is radius allowe when using default network access as allowed protocols.??&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;also the below looks like something i will use can it be used for FTD.?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;For specific Authorisation rules you can match on the AD Group(s), if multiple tunnel-groups you can match on the ASA/FTD tunnel group - use the condition "&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Cisco-VPN3000:CVPN3000/ASA/PIX7x-Client-Type" EQUAL &amp;lt;tunnel-group name&amp;gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;also are policy sets/rules checked ina top down fashion untill a match is found ??&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2022 16:50:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>benolyndav</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-08-04T16:50:51Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ISE Policy Set Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-policy-set-question/m-p/4663757#M576552</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have an exisiting ISE deployment and I am in the middle of trying to set up anyconnect, would I be best creating a new policy set for&amp;nbsp; anyconnect use and would this interfere with the esisting Policy Set.?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also whats the best way to create a Radius rule for Anyconnect I have a AD group for the authorisation so was thinking of for AuthZ&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;policy =&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Network Device Firewall and AD group =&amp;nbsp; then AuthZ profile for a DACL for Anyconnect users.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;is this ok .??&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2022 15:25:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-policy-set-question/m-p/4663757#M576552</guid>
      <dc:creator>benolyndav</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-08-04T15:25:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE Policy Set Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-policy-set-question/m-p/4663763#M576553</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/445131"&gt;@benolyndav&lt;/a&gt; if this is for AnyConnect users for Remote Access, then yes personally I'd setup a Policy Set which is separate to Wired/Wireless. You can match on a condition of the NAS IP address of the Firewall (ASA/FTD) for the Policy Set, which would therefore not apply to existing Wired/Wireless policy set - though that depends on the condition you already use.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;For specific Authorisation rules you can match on the AD Group(s), if multiple tunnel-groups you can match on the ASA/FTD tunnel group - use the condition "&lt;SPAN&gt;Cisco-VPN3000:CVPN3000/ASA/PIX7x-Client-Type" EQUAL &amp;lt;tunnel-group name&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2022 15:38:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-policy-set-question/m-p/4663763#M576553</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rob Ingram</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-08-04T15:38:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE Policy Set Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-policy-set-question/m-p/4663804#M576554</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Rob&lt;BR /&gt;so .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1.new policy set&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2.Authentication = Radius Nas IP Address + x.x.x.x,&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;is radius allowe when using default network access as allowed protocols.??&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;also the below looks like something i will use can it be used for FTD.?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;For specific Authorisation rules you can match on the AD Group(s), if multiple tunnel-groups you can match on the ASA/FTD tunnel group - use the condition "&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Cisco-VPN3000:CVPN3000/ASA/PIX7x-Client-Type" EQUAL &amp;lt;tunnel-group name&amp;gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;also are policy sets/rules checked ina top down fashion untill a match is found ??&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2022 16:50:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-policy-set-question/m-p/4663804#M576554</guid>
      <dc:creator>benolyndav</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-08-04T16:50:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE Policy Set Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-policy-set-question/m-p/4663810#M576556</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/445131"&gt;@benolyndav&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Create a new Policy Set, the condition to match the Policy Set can be "Radius Nas IP Address + x.x.x.x". Yes, the Policy Sets are matched top down, if the connection request does not come from the FTD, then the next policy set would be attempted.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Yes, the authorisation rule example would work - the FTD uses the same RADIUS attributes as the ASA. Authorisation Rules are also matched from top down, until a match found.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2022 16:58:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-policy-set-question/m-p/4663810#M576556</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rob Ingram</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-08-04T16:58:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

