<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ISE Upgrade from 2.7 to 3.1 Two Node deployment in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-upgrade-from-2-7-to-3-1-two-node-deployment/m-p/4675524#M576889</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;- Check this thread :&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/upgrade-ise-from-2-7-to-3-1/td-p/4546920" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/upgrade-ise-from-2-7-to-3-1/td-p/4546920&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;, albeit opinions do differ look at my arguments for an 'offline path' in the upgrade process.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;M.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2022 17:20:52 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Mark Elsen</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-08-25T17:20:52Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ISE Upgrade from 2.7 to 3.1 Two Node deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-upgrade-from-2-7-to-3-1-two-node-deployment/m-p/4675324#M576887</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We have a Small Deployment with two nodes but PSN is critical&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Which upgrade method will you recommend and in which order do we have to proceed&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="STEPHANEDRAY_0-1661432782042.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/160790i77A18AD1AC11FCC3/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="STEPHANEDRAY_0-1661432782042.png" alt="STEPHANEDRAY_0-1661432782042.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2022 13:07:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-upgrade-from-2-7-to-3-1-two-node-deployment/m-p/4675324#M576887</guid>
      <dc:creator>STEPHANE DRAY</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-08-25T13:07:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE Upgrade from 2.7 to 3.1 Two Node deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-upgrade-from-2-7-to-3-1-two-node-deployment/m-p/4675524#M576889</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;- Check this thread :&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/upgrade-ise-from-2-7-to-3-1/td-p/4546920" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/upgrade-ise-from-2-7-to-3-1/td-p/4546920&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;, albeit opinions do differ look at my arguments for an 'offline path' in the upgrade process.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;M.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2022 17:20:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-upgrade-from-2-7-to-3-1-two-node-deployment/m-p/4675524#M576889</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark Elsen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-08-25T17:20:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

