<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: pxGrid High availability in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/pxgrid-high-availability/m-p/4695068#M577426</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;That table does not provide the full details, so it is a bit misleading. See the following table pulled from the CiscoLive BRKSEC-3432 session. The MnT node publishes the session directory to PXG nodes.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Screen Shot 2022-09-28 at 9.20.29 am.png" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/163573i043BD948B82B3D59/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Screen Shot 2022-09-28 at 9.20.29 am.png" alt="Screen Shot 2022-09-28 at 9.20.29 am.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2022 23:27:12 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Greg Gibbs</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-09-27T23:27:12Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>pxGrid High availability</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/pxgrid-high-availability/m-p/4693870#M577395</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I am running ISE 3.1.&lt;BR /&gt;two nodes:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Node1:&lt;BR /&gt;- Primary PAN&lt;BR /&gt;- Primary MnT&lt;BR /&gt;- PSN1&lt;BR /&gt;- pxGrid 1&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Node2:&lt;BR /&gt;- Secondary PAN&lt;BR /&gt;- Secondary MnT&lt;BR /&gt;- PSN2&lt;BR /&gt;- pxGrid 2&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I understand that ISE 3.1, only pxgrid v2 is supported and we can run pxigrid active/active.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In the above setup, if Node1 fails, Primary PAN fails. Have to bring up Secondary PAN manually.&lt;BR /&gt;During this time, if secondary PAN is not up yet, will&amp;nbsp;my existing pxGrid services affected?&lt;BR /&gt;I will assume that Node2 pxGrid 2 will still be available.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is this the correct understanding ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;BR /&gt;Eng Wee&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2022 16:14:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/pxgrid-high-availability/m-p/4693870#M577395</guid>
      <dc:creator>e-chuah</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-09-26T16:14:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: pxGrid High availability</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/pxgrid-high-availability/m-p/4693957#M577396</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The pxgrid service on the secondary node might still respond on port 8910 since pxgv2 is active/active, but the high availability guide indicates that when the primary admin node is down, pxgrid services will not be available. I haven't tested this personally, but I suspect the guide is correct.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/ise/3-1/admin_guide/b_ise_admin_3_1/b_ISE_admin_31_deployment.html#ID59" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/ise/3-1/admin_guide/b_ise_admin_3_1/b_ISE_admin_31_deployment.html#ID59&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2022 17:21:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/pxgrid-high-availability/m-p/4693957#M577396</guid>
      <dc:creator>Damien Miller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-09-26T17:21:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: pxGrid High availability</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/pxgrid-high-availability/m-p/4694163#M577401</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks Damien for the reply. I believe you are right based on the documentation provided.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2022 23:25:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/pxgrid-high-availability/m-p/4694163#M577401</guid>
      <dc:creator>e-chuah</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-09-26T23:25:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: pxGrid High availability</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/pxgrid-high-availability/m-p/4695068#M577426</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;That table does not provide the full details, so it is a bit misleading. See the following table pulled from the CiscoLive BRKSEC-3432 session. The MnT node publishes the session directory to PXG nodes.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Screen Shot 2022-09-28 at 9.20.29 am.png" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/163573i043BD948B82B3D59/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Screen Shot 2022-09-28 at 9.20.29 am.png" alt="Screen Shot 2022-09-28 at 9.20.29 am.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2022 23:27:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/pxgrid-high-availability/m-p/4695068#M577426</guid>
      <dc:creator>Greg Gibbs</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-09-27T23:27:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: pxGrid High availability</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/pxgrid-high-availability/m-p/4697242#M577520</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Greg,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the inputs. I will further test this out in the lab to understand the behaviour.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Rgds&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Eng Wee&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2022 15:35:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/pxgrid-high-availability/m-p/4697242#M577520</guid>
      <dc:creator>e-chuah</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-10-02T15:35:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: pxGrid High availability</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/pxgrid-high-availability/m-p/5066362#M588682</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;basic question...if I do the integration FMC&amp;lt;-&amp;gt;ISE and I shutdown FMC, what would happen? Is pxgrid communication done directly between FTD and ISE or FMC is some kind of proxy for pxgrid? So in this case high availability for FMC is a must?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;thank you&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2024 13:09:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/pxgrid-high-availability/m-p/5066362#M588682</guid>
      <dc:creator>peter.matuska1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-11T13:09:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: pxGrid High availability</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/pxgrid-high-availability/m-p/5066420#M588688</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/58587"&gt;@peter.matuska1&lt;/a&gt; the FTD learns the IP/User bindings from the FMC, which learns them from ISE via pxGrid. If you only have a single FMC and you lose that, no new IP/username bindings will be learnt by the FTDs. So yes, have HA FMC in this scenario.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2024 14:06:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/pxgrid-high-availability/m-p/5066420#M588688</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rob Ingram</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-11T14:06:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: pxGrid High availability</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/pxgrid-high-availability/m-p/5066423#M588689</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;ok, that's what I thought. thank you for confirmation.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2024 14:08:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/pxgrid-high-availability/m-p/5066423#M588689</guid>
      <dc:creator>peter.matuska1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-11T14:08:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

