<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Is it possible that PID: R-ISE-VM-K9 migrate to the PID:R-ISE-VMM- in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/is-it-possible-that-pid-r-ise-vm-k9-migrate-to-the-pid-r-ise-vmm/m-p/4699997#M577643</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/40433"&gt;@jvujcich&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;R-ISE-VM-K9=&lt;/STRONG&gt; is NOT &lt;STRONG&gt;ISE-VM-K9&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;R-ISE-VM-K9= is a licensing PID whereas ISE-VM-K9 is a platform PID. All ISE VM instances will show ISE-VM-K9 as the PID and we will consuming licensing PID according to the ISE releases.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2022 17:01:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>hslai</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-10-07T17:01:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Is it possible that PID: R-ISE-VM-K9 migrate to the PID:R-ISE-VMM-K9?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/is-it-possible-that-pid-r-ise-vm-k9-migrate-to-the-pid-r-ise-vmm/m-p/4314572#M566445</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi , Everyone&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The EoS/EoL information for R-ISE-VM-K9 is announced by Cisco.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/security/identity-services-engine/eos-eol-notice-c51-741254.html" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/security/identity-services-engine/eos-eol-notice-c51-741254.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And it will be EoL on&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;February 28, 2022.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;But the document describe the&amp;nbsp;Replacement Product Part Number is "R-ISE-VMM-K9="&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I would like to know is it possible&amp;nbsp;that PID [R-ISE-VM-K9] migrate to the PID [R-ISE-VMM-K9]?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;So that I can renew&amp;nbsp;Service Contract for the next five year.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Or I need to buy the new "&lt;SPAN&gt;R-ISE-VMM-K9" and change the config to the new one?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;H1&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/H1&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2021 15:49:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/is-it-possible-that-pid-r-ise-vm-k9-migrate-to-the-pid-r-ise-vmm/m-p/4314572#M566445</guid>
      <dc:creator>ach3452002</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-03-26T15:49:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is it possible that PID: R-ISE-VM-K9 migrate to the PID:R-ISE-VMM-K9?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/is-it-possible-that-pid-r-ise-vm-k9-migrate-to-the-pid-r-ise-vmm/m-p/4314683#M566447</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes you can convert them. Open a TAC case and the licensing team will migrate the old&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;R-ISE-VM-K9 you bought to&amp;nbsp;R-ISE-VMM-K9. They will then provide&amp;nbsp;them as either smart licenses or traditional PAK (2.7 and below).&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I recommend&amp;nbsp;moving to smart licensing if you have not already done so, now would be a good time since 3.0 requires smart licensing.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2021 19:54:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/is-it-possible-that-pid-r-ise-vm-k9-migrate-to-the-pid-r-ise-vmm/m-p/4314683#M566447</guid>
      <dc:creator>Damien Miller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-03-26T19:54:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is it possible that PID: R-ISE-VM-K9 migrate to the PID:R-ISE-VMM-K9?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/is-it-possible-that-pid-r-ise-vm-k9-migrate-to-the-pid-r-ise-vmm/m-p/4432157#M568422</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Damien, Thanks for the confirmation, i knew that, but have an aditional question. What if the customer wants to continue their support contract with those licenses. For the&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;R-ISE-VM-K9 you are no longer able to renew you support contract after feb 28th, 2022, but if you have converted your license to smart before you end up with a perpetual licenses which corresponds to:&amp;nbsp;R-ISE-VMM-K9=, but you are no longer able to buy support on those. Should we request new instance id's?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Kr,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Rob&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2021 09:33:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/is-it-possible-that-pid-r-ise-vm-k9-migrate-to-the-pid-r-ise-vmm/m-p/4432157#M568422</guid>
      <dc:creator>RobGrootendorst94749</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-13T09:33:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is it possible that PID: R-ISE-VM-K9 migrate to the PID:R-ISE-VMM-</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/is-it-possible-that-pid-r-ise-vm-k9-migrate-to-the-pid-r-ise-vmm/m-p/4652287#M576232</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Dimian,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your comments.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;After the migration (from ISE-VM to ISE-VMM) is done, should the PID be updated? I have done the migration but I still have the same PID and on top of that two VM licenses (before one).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;All the best,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2022 13:08:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/is-it-possible-that-pid-r-ise-vm-k9-migrate-to-the-pid-r-ise-vmm/m-p/4652287#M576232</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kabil_M</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-07-18T13:08:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is it possible that PID: R-ISE-VM-K9 migrate to the PID:R-ISE-VMM-</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/is-it-possible-that-pid-r-ise-vm-k9-migrate-to-the-pid-r-ise-vmm/m-p/4652299#M576234</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You should be using the VMC (VM-common) license now.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2022 13:35:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/is-it-possible-that-pid-r-ise-vm-k9-migrate-to-the-pid-r-ise-vmm/m-p/4652299#M576234</guid>
      <dc:creator>ahollifield</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-07-18T13:35:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is it possible that PID: R-ISE-VM-K9 migrate to the PID:R-ISE-VMM-</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/is-it-possible-that-pid-r-ise-vm-k9-migrate-to-the-pid-r-ise-vmm/m-p/4652309#M576235</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Ahollifield,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;For the VMC license, you must have the Smart License activated. In my case, I have a traditional license and I migrate from R-ISE-VM-K9 to R-ISE-&lt;STRONG&gt;VMM&lt;/STRONG&gt;-K9 (not R-ISE-VM&lt;STRONG&gt;C&lt;/STRONG&gt;-K9).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Best Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Kabil M.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2022 13:57:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/is-it-possible-that-pid-r-ise-vm-k9-migrate-to-the-pid-r-ise-vmm/m-p/4652309#M576235</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kabil_M</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-07-18T13:57:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is it possible that PID: R-ISE-VM-K9 migrate to the PID:R-ISE-VMM-</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/is-it-possible-that-pid-r-ise-vm-k9-migrate-to-the-pid-r-ise-vmm/m-p/4652324#M576238</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;That is correct.&amp;nbsp; However, the move to Smart Licensing is required in ISE 3.0 (all other ISE versions have EOL announced) so it makes sense to go ahead and move to Smart Licensing.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2022 14:29:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/is-it-possible-that-pid-r-ise-vm-k9-migrate-to-the-pid-r-ise-vmm/m-p/4652324#M576238</guid>
      <dc:creator>ahollifield</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-07-18T14:29:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is it possible that PID: R-ISE-VM-K9 migrate to the PID:R-ISE-VMM-</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/is-it-possible-that-pid-r-ise-vm-k9-migrate-to-the-pid-r-ise-vmm/m-p/4652458#M576240</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, I know. We plan to update it in the medium term but my question is if after migrating the Virtual Machine license from ISE-VM to ISE-VMM the PID has to be updated on the ISE, that is, instead of showing "PID: ISE-&lt;STRONG&gt;VM&lt;/STRONG&gt;-K9" appears "PID: ISE-&lt;STRONG&gt;VMM&lt;/STRONG&gt;-K9".&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2022 17:04:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/is-it-possible-that-pid-r-ise-vm-k9-migrate-to-the-pid-r-ise-vmm/m-p/4652458#M576240</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kabil_M</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-07-18T17:04:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is it possible that PID: R-ISE-VM-K9 migrate to the PID:R-ISE-VMM-</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/is-it-possible-that-pid-r-ise-vm-k9-migrate-to-the-pid-r-ise-vmm/m-p/4652648#M576246</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/849812"&gt;@Kabil_M&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;it make sense to me that the &lt;STRONG&gt;PID&lt;/STRONG&gt; shows the "correct &lt;STRONG&gt;PID&lt;/STRONG&gt;",&amp;nbsp; in your case &lt;STRONG&gt;PID: ISE-VMM-K9&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;Please double check the information via the following commands:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;ise/admin# show tech-support&lt;BR /&gt;...&lt;BR /&gt;*****************************************&lt;BR /&gt;Displaying UDI (Unique Device Identifier) information...&lt;BR /&gt;*****************************************&lt;BR /&gt;UDI PID: &lt;STRONG&gt;ISE-VM-K9&lt;/STRONG&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;...&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;or&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;ise/admin# show inventory&lt;BR /&gt;NAME: "ISE-VM-K9 chassis", DESCR: "ISE-VM-K9 chassis"&lt;BR /&gt;PID: ISE-VM-K9 , VID: V01 , SN: XXXXXXX&lt;BR /&gt;...&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps !!!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2022 04:32:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/is-it-possible-that-pid-r-ise-vm-k9-migrate-to-the-pid-r-ise-vmm/m-p/4652648#M576246</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marcelo Morais</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-07-19T04:32:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is it possible that PID: R-ISE-VM-K9 migrate to the PID:R-ISE-VMM-</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/is-it-possible-that-pid-r-ise-vm-k9-migrate-to-the-pid-r-ise-vmm/m-p/4655371#M576301</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your comment Marcelo.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;After launching those commands, I still see that the PID is VM and not VMM, do you know if it is necessary to take any further action for the ISE to update this PID?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Kabil M.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2022 09:44:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/is-it-possible-that-pid-r-ise-vm-k9-migrate-to-the-pid-r-ise-vmm/m-p/4655371#M576301</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kabil_M</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-07-22T09:44:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is it possible that PID: R-ISE-VM-K9 migrate to the PID:R-ISE-VMM-</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/is-it-possible-that-pid-r-ise-vm-k9-migrate-to-the-pid-r-ise-vmm/m-p/4655423#M576306</link>
      <description>&lt;P class="lia-align-justify"&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/849812"&gt;@Kabil_M&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class="lia-align-justify"&gt;&amp;nbsp;since every command shows the same info, then IMO you are good (maybe it's a&amp;nbsp;&lt;U&gt;backward compatibility&lt;/U&gt; issue).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class="lia-align-justify"&gt;&amp;nbsp;You can double check with &lt;STRONG&gt;TAC&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class="lia-align-justify"&gt;Note: the &lt;STRONG&gt;show tech-support&lt;/STRONG&gt; and &lt;STRONG&gt;show inventory&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;command&amp;nbsp;execute a &lt;STRONG&gt;Linux&lt;/STRONG&gt; command to show the &lt;STRONG&gt;VM UDI PID&lt;/STRONG&gt;. I'll start paying attention to this !!!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class="lia-align-justify"&gt;Hope this helps !!!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2022 11:42:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/is-it-possible-that-pid-r-ise-vm-k9-migrate-to-the-pid-r-ise-vmm/m-p/4655423#M576306</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marcelo Morais</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-07-22T11:42:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is it possible that PID: R-ISE-VM-K9 migrate to the PID:R-ISE-VMM-</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/is-it-possible-that-pid-r-ise-vm-k9-migrate-to-the-pid-r-ise-vmm/m-p/4673857#M576834</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Similar situation we have, not know to get product under support.&lt;BR /&gt;PID still remain same even installing new VM.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2022 09:34:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/is-it-possible-that-pid-r-ise-vm-k9-migrate-to-the-pid-r-ise-vmm/m-p/4673857#M576834</guid>
      <dc:creator>SAM1275</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-08-23T09:34:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is it possible that PID: R-ISE-VM-K9 migrate to the PID:R-ISE-VMM-</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/is-it-possible-that-pid-r-ise-vm-k9-migrate-to-the-pid-r-ise-vmm/m-p/4673885#M576835</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1366250"&gt;@SAM1275&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;what is your &lt;STRONG&gt;ISE&lt;/STRONG&gt; &lt;U&gt;version and patch&lt;/U&gt;?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2022 11:16:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/is-it-possible-that-pid-r-ise-vm-k9-migrate-to-the-pid-r-ise-vmm/m-p/4673885#M576835</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marcelo Morais</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-08-23T11:16:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is it possible that PID: R-ISE-VM-K9 migrate to the PID:R-ISE-VMM-</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/is-it-possible-that-pid-r-ise-vm-k9-migrate-to-the-pid-r-ise-vmm/m-p/4674620#M576847</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;version&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;2.6.0.156&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;patch 3&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2022 10:40:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/is-it-possible-that-pid-r-ise-vm-k9-migrate-to-the-pid-r-ise-vmm/m-p/4674620#M576847</guid>
      <dc:creator>SAM1275</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-08-24T10:40:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is it possible that PID: R-ISE-VM-K9 migrate to the PID:R-ISE-VMM-</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/is-it-possible-that-pid-r-ise-vm-k9-migrate-to-the-pid-r-ise-vmm/m-p/4697805#M577546</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have a similar issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I got our hosting team to build a fresh ISE3.1 from a file I downloaded from Cisco (ISE-3.1.0.518-virtual-SNS3615-SNS3655-600.ova ).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It built okay at Ver 3.1, but the PID is the old EOL one (ISE-VM-K9).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would expect to see the latest PID (R-ISE-VMC-K9).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there something wrong with the OVA Cisco provided?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2022 02:11:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/is-it-possible-that-pid-r-ise-vm-k9-migrate-to-the-pid-r-ise-vmm/m-p/4697805#M577546</guid>
      <dc:creator>jvujcich</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-10-04T02:11:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is it possible that PID: R-ISE-VM-K9 migrate to the PID:R-ISE-VMM-</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/is-it-possible-that-pid-r-ise-vm-k9-migrate-to-the-pid-r-ise-vmm/m-p/4698427#M577571</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/40433"&gt;@jvujcich&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;Your case is different. ISE 3.1 uses Cisco Smart Licensing. As a result, you need migrate the licenses in your Cisco smart account. More info, see &lt;A href="http://cs.co/ise-ordering" target="_blank"&gt;http://cs.co/ise-ordering&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2022 01:38:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/is-it-possible-that-pid-r-ise-vm-k9-migrate-to-the-pid-r-ise-vmm/m-p/4698427#M577571</guid>
      <dc:creator>hslai</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-10-05T01:38:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is it possible that PID: R-ISE-VM-K9 migrate to the PID:R-ISE-VMM-</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/is-it-possible-that-pid-r-ise-vm-k9-migrate-to-the-pid-r-ise-vmm/m-p/4699704#M577630</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Hslai,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your getting back to me.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We &lt;EM&gt;are&lt;/EM&gt; using&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;Cisco Smart Licensing, but I'm not convinced that has anything to do with it. On a fresh VM build, using a new 3.1 ova, I would expect the new VM would have the latest PID of R-ISE-VMC-K9=&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Just seems odd that you end up with an older EOL PID when you are using a new 3.1 ova to build it. Indeed, if I tried to connect the VM to Smart Licensing, I'll bet I get an error because the portal with detect an old EOL PID.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2022 03:15:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/is-it-possible-that-pid-r-ise-vm-k9-migrate-to-the-pid-r-ise-vmm/m-p/4699704#M577630</guid>
      <dc:creator>jvujcich</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-10-07T03:15:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is it possible that PID: R-ISE-VM-K9 migrate to the PID:R-ISE-VMM-</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/is-it-possible-that-pid-r-ise-vm-k9-migrate-to-the-pid-r-ise-vmm/m-p/4699997#M577643</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/40433"&gt;@jvujcich&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;R-ISE-VM-K9=&lt;/STRONG&gt; is NOT &lt;STRONG&gt;ISE-VM-K9&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;R-ISE-VM-K9= is a licensing PID whereas ISE-VM-K9 is a platform PID. All ISE VM instances will show ISE-VM-K9 as the PID and we will consuming licensing PID according to the ISE releases.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2022 17:01:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/is-it-possible-that-pid-r-ise-vm-k9-migrate-to-the-pid-r-ise-vmm/m-p/4699997#M577643</guid>
      <dc:creator>hslai</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-10-07T17:01:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is it possible that PID: R-ISE-VM-K9 migrate to the PID:R-ISE-VMM-</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/is-it-possible-that-pid-r-ise-vm-k9-migrate-to-the-pid-r-ise-vmm/m-p/4703002#M577752</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Oh okay, So a "sh inventory" will always show ISE-VM-K9, No matter how new the OVI is?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Its a bit counter-intuitive.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hopefully everyone is clear that that we can have a Platform PID that doesn't necessarily need to match the&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;licensing PID.&amp;nbsp; i.e. After our&amp;nbsp; ISE 3.1 build, we will end up with a&amp;nbsp;Platform PID of&amp;nbsp;ISE-VM-K9&amp;nbsp; and a&amp;nbsp;licensing PID of R-ISE-VMC-K9=.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2022 01:25:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/is-it-possible-that-pid-r-ise-vm-k9-migrate-to-the-pid-r-ise-vmm/m-p/4703002#M577752</guid>
      <dc:creator>jvujcich</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-10-14T01:25:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

