<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ISE 2.4 to 3.0 Backup and Restore without De-Register in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-4-to-3-0-backup-and-restore-without-de-register/m-p/4731702#M578611</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Planning a migration where I update ISE from 2.4 to 3.0.&amp;nbsp; It's a two-node environment with Active/Passive.&amp;nbsp; I've reviewed the documentation and it mentions deregistering the Secondary and reimaging it.&amp;nbsp; Would be a bad idea to just start standing up a new environment on 3.0 with Backup/Restore without Deregistering?&amp;nbsp; I can pretty easily start just moving network device configurations to use this new environment.&amp;nbsp; I would pull the backup from the active node.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2022 19:57:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>shortcut144</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-12-02T19:57:51Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ISE 2.4 to 3.0 Backup and Restore without De-Register</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-4-to-3-0-backup-and-restore-without-de-register/m-p/4731702#M578611</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Planning a migration where I update ISE from 2.4 to 3.0.&amp;nbsp; It's a two-node environment with Active/Passive.&amp;nbsp; I've reviewed the documentation and it mentions deregistering the Secondary and reimaging it.&amp;nbsp; Would be a bad idea to just start standing up a new environment on 3.0 with Backup/Restore without Deregistering?&amp;nbsp; I can pretty easily start just moving network device configurations to use this new environment.&amp;nbsp; I would pull the backup from the active node.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2022 19:57:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-4-to-3-0-backup-and-restore-without-de-register/m-p/4731702#M578611</guid>
      <dc:creator>shortcut144</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-12-02T19:57:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE 2.4 to 3.0 Backup and Restore without De-Register</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-4-to-3-0-backup-and-restore-without-de-register/m-p/4731729#M578612</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Why not 3.1?&amp;nbsp; I always opt for the parallel deployment / backup/restore approach.&amp;nbsp; It also gives you an opportunity to clean up old NADs, endpoints, and policies you no longer use.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2022 21:03:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-4-to-3-0-backup-and-restore-without-de-register/m-p/4731729#M578612</guid>
      <dc:creator>ahollifield</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-12-02T21:03:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE 2.4 to 3.0 Backup and Restore without De-Register</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-4-to-3-0-backup-and-restore-without-de-register/m-p/4731739#M578613</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I would but it doesn't look like you can jump from 2.4 straight to 3.1.&amp;nbsp; I figure I may get 3.0 stood up get a few switches on it and then update to 3.1.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2022 21:24:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-4-to-3-0-backup-and-restore-without-de-register/m-p/4731739#M578613</guid>
      <dc:creator>shortcut144</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-12-02T21:24:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE 2.4 to 3.0 Backup and Restore without De-Register</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-4-to-3-0-backup-and-restore-without-de-register/m-p/4731745#M578614</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/security-knowledge-base/ise-version-upgrade-matrix/ta-p/3653501" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://community.cisco.com/t5/security-knowledge-base/ise-version-upgrade-matrix/ta-p/3653501&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Correct.&amp;nbsp; How complicated is your ISE deployment?&amp;nbsp; You could reconfigure your policies from scratch and then just export/import the NADs.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Other option is import 2.4 backup into a 3.0 temporary VM.&amp;nbsp; Backup temporary 3.0 VM and import into final 3.1 deployment.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2022 21:33:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-4-to-3-0-backup-and-restore-without-de-register/m-p/4731745#M578614</guid>
      <dc:creator>ahollifield</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-12-02T21:33:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

