<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ISE Wired Guest Fallback Authorization for Non-domain Machines in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-wired-guest-fallback-authorization-for-non-domain-machines/m-p/4811878#M581068</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you, Greg.&amp;nbsp; I apologize for the late response but appreciate yours.&amp;nbsp; I will review the URL provided and test it out in my lab to confirm all is working as expected.&amp;nbsp; Thanks again!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2023 12:28:49 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>TerenceLockette</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-04-11T12:28:49Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ISE Wired Guest Fallback Authorization for Non-domain Machines</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-wired-guest-fallback-authorization-for-non-domain-machines/m-p/4801392#M580756</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have implemented EAP chaining using the AnyConnect NAM module for domain-joined machines which is working as expected.&amp;nbsp; What is not working is when I attempt to connect a non-domain computer to a port configured for dot1x and mab.&amp;nbsp; The machine never connects and I don't even see the attempts in the logs.&amp;nbsp; The non-domain machine does not have AnyConnect installed and would be equivalent to an employee bringing a personal machine into the office and connecting it to the wired network (ie no AnyConnect or Internal Certs).&amp;nbsp; I feel like I'm missing something but can't figure it out.&amp;nbsp; Here are some screen shots of my policy set:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="terencelockettenercnet_0-1679778217428.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/180124i8359AE2F791CF2B6/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="terencelockettenercnet_0-1679778217428.png" alt="terencelockettenercnet_0-1679778217428.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="terencelockettenercnet_1-1679778368202.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/180125iC0D40DBBC7650078/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="terencelockettenercnet_1-1679778368202.png" alt="terencelockettenercnet_1-1679778368202.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here is the switchport configuration:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interface GigabitEthernet1/0/1&lt;BR /&gt;switchport mode access&lt;BR /&gt;switchport nonegotiate&lt;BR /&gt;authentication event fail action next-method&lt;BR /&gt;authentication event server dead action authorize&lt;BR /&gt;authentication event server alive action reinitialize&lt;BR /&gt;authentication order dot1x mab&lt;BR /&gt;authentication priority dot1x mab&lt;BR /&gt;authentication port-control auto&lt;BR /&gt;authentication violation restrict&lt;BR /&gt;mab&lt;BR /&gt;dot1x pae authenticator&lt;BR /&gt;dot1x timeout tx-period 10&lt;BR /&gt;spanning-tree portfast edge&lt;BR /&gt;spanning-tree bpduguard enable&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have played around with the config from ISE and the switch port by changing some settings around to see if I can get it to work but all has failed.&amp;nbsp; For instance, in ISE, I've tried changing the order of the AuthC and AuthZ rules.&amp;nbsp; On the switch, I've changed the authentication order and priority parameters around but to no avail.&amp;nbsp; Any assistance in the right direction would be greatly appreciated.&amp;nbsp; Feel free to ask for any additional information.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2023 21:12:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-wired-guest-fallback-authorization-for-non-domain-machines/m-p/4801392#M580756</guid>
      <dc:creator>TerenceLockette</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-25T21:12:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE Wired Guest Fallback Authorization for Non-domain Machines</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-wired-guest-fallback-authorization-for-non-domain-machines/m-p/4801609#M580763</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;On your AuthC rule for MAB, you need to ensure that ISE allows the session to 'fall-through' to the AuthZ Process if the MAC address is not already in the endpoint database. This is done by setting the option for 'If User not found = CONTINUE'&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Screenshot 2023-03-27 at 8.34.33 am.png" style="width: 200px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/180153i370BFF29D3F127D3/image-size/small?v=v2&amp;amp;px=200" role="button" title="Screenshot 2023-03-27 at 8.34.33 am.png" alt="Screenshot 2023-03-27 at 8.34.33 am.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In your AuthZ Policy, there is little value in having a separate rule for MAB since anything that is not matching your 802.1X rules is going to hit the default. When the Wired Guest use case is deployed, it's common to just set your Guest redirect rule as the result for the Default rule. You would then need an AuthZ rule above it that matches on the Guest flow (and optionally the Remember Me flow) and provides the resulting authorization.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;See the &lt;A href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/security-knowledge-base/ise-guest-access-prescriptive-deployment-guide/ta-p/3640475#toc-hId--1992631054" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;ISE Guest Access Prescriptive Deployment Guide&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;for more information on how the Guest flow works and example policies.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Mar 2023 21:41:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-wired-guest-fallback-authorization-for-non-domain-machines/m-p/4801609#M580763</guid>
      <dc:creator>Greg Gibbs</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-26T21:41:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE Wired Guest Fallback Authorization for Non-domain Machines</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-wired-guest-fallback-authorization-for-non-domain-machines/m-p/4811878#M581068</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you, Greg.&amp;nbsp; I apologize for the late response but appreciate yours.&amp;nbsp; I will review the URL provided and test it out in my lab to confirm all is working as expected.&amp;nbsp; Thanks again!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2023 12:28:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-wired-guest-fallback-authorization-for-non-domain-machines/m-p/4811878#M581068</guid>
      <dc:creator>TerenceLockette</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-04-11T12:28:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

