<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Migrate external scep server to ise in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/migrate-external-scep-server-to-ise/m-p/4847790#M582064</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/199513"&gt;@ahollifield&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We just used for Byod to register new endpoint. Is it enough? What is the feature that is not support compare to Microsoft?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2023 17:26:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>williamtan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-06-02T17:26:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Migrate external scep server to ise</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/migrate-external-scep-server-to-ise/m-p/4847350#M582054</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The current ISE is integrated with external Microsoft scep server and everything is running well. The scep server is used for Byod purpose. Customer plan to discontinue the external Microsoft scep server and migrate it to ISE. Any impact to existing users after the migration?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2023 05:28:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/migrate-external-scep-server-to-ise/m-p/4847350#M582054</guid>
      <dc:creator>williamtan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-02T05:28:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Migrate external scep server to ise</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/migrate-external-scep-server-to-ise/m-p/4847787#M582062</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;No but the ISE CA is much less feature rich than the Microsoft variant.&amp;nbsp; Are we sure the ISE CA will satisfy the use-cases?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2023 17:14:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/migrate-external-scep-server-to-ise/m-p/4847787#M582062</guid>
      <dc:creator>ahollifield</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-02T17:14:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Migrate external scep server to ise</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/migrate-external-scep-server-to-ise/m-p/4847790#M582064</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/199513"&gt;@ahollifield&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We just used for Byod to register new endpoint. Is it enough? What is the feature that is not support compare to Microsoft?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2023 17:26:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/migrate-external-scep-server-to-ise/m-p/4847790#M582064</guid>
      <dc:creator>williamtan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-02T17:26:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

